[bpjam]

Actually, the movie isn't pushing a gay agenda. The review is trying to hijack a movie to promote a gay agenda he would LIKE the movie to be promoting. Its somewhat akin to when gay groups go back in time and label every famous person is history as being secretly taking it in the *ss. Its revisionist history, but its not true just because they say it is.

[Howlin]

Exactly.

And all he showed is his ignorance!

"Not that there's anything wrong with that."

is the biggest, longest running joke on Seinfeld. If he wasn't so blinded by his own agenda, he'd see that it's a throw to that show, not President Bush.

[EdReform]

Ping

[tiamat]

bpjam wrote:


Actually, the movie isn't pushing a gay agenda. The review is trying to hijack a movie to promote a gay agenda he would LIKE the movie to be promoting. Its somewhat akin to when gay groups go back in time and label every famous person is history as being secretly taking it in the *ss. Its revisionist history, but its not true just because they say it is.

---

THANK YOU!

As regards the first Shrek... gee... I'm seeing a movie that talked about the sanctity of marriage, and True Love, and fighting for one's home and doing what's right.

Yeah, sure. There's some fart jokes. And som inuendo that nyone under the age of 14 is NOT going to get. It was still great fun, and I am not getting my panties in a wad over it.


Besides, since FR is supposed to be down on all things Disney, and since Shrek put it to Disney so hard and so often, well, it's gotta be a GOOD thing, right?