Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Screech away, feminazis!
1 posted on 06/02/2004 5:04:08 PM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Paul Atreides
... guaranteed to cause fury amongst feminists ....

She and her daughters were supposedly outraged by the Romans ... and since rape is one of the sacraments of feminism, I'd imagine they like her.

2 posted on 06/02/2004 5:07:21 PM PDT by Agnes Heep (Solus cum sola non cogitabuntur orare pater noster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Atreides

Within the space of a year, Gibson has become independent film's most interesting director.


4 posted on 06/02/2004 5:18:31 PM PDT by Rocko (Michael Moore: "Dude, I'm a hypocrite.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Atreides
Boudicca (AD 62)What do we really know of this great British Queen of ancient Britain?

Gotta love redheads.

5 posted on 06/02/2004 5:19:13 PM PDT by mdittmar (May God watch over our Military men and women who serve to keep us free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Atreides

I hope he does!


6 posted on 06/02/2004 5:19:22 PM PDT by k2blader (Why isn't Social Security voluntary? Think about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Atreides

Oh, wow, cool! Chariot battles!


7 posted on 06/02/2004 5:20:37 PM PDT by Tax-chick ("It's only important for me to know!" (Gen. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Atreides

Boy, I hope he includes the part where she crucified the women and girls of London, lining the crosses along the banks of the Thames to rot. It's called Lady Bank to this day.


8 posted on 06/02/2004 5:26:17 PM PDT by Red Boots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Atreides

What's so special about Boudicca? She's more or less a footnote in history.


9 posted on 06/02/2004 5:26:20 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Atreides

Take any figure where there's been emotional investment and you're going to annoy someone.

Hmmm, I think Mel is onto a real money making formula. Irritate a liberal group and roll in the dough as they go ape, LOL.

It's been working great for Limbaugh for years.

10 posted on 06/02/2004 5:27:32 PM PDT by ancient_geezer (Equality, the French disease: Everyone is equal beneath the guillotine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Atreides
Boudicca has an interesting name. Assuming the Romans spelled her name out phonetically, the way they heard it, what we have here is a name that is also a title.

To start with, it begins with a special prefix "Bo". It has the very same meaning as the "Mac", "Mc", and "O'" found in names vastly more familiar to modern times.

However, it's use as an honorific was pretty much confined to the language spoken in ancient Brittain. Some Welsh (Cymmru) names use it. It's still pretty common in Brittany where it appears as "Bois" in hundreds of "dit names".

By the way, "Bo" does not mean "boy", an erroneous translation frequently found in Irish and Scottish tracts on the subject. It's much more like LORD/LADY when in the name of a tribal leader.

The second part of the good queen's name follows immediately after the honorific "Bo". That's "ud", or "ad" (as it might be derived in one of the alternative spellings "Boadicea").

This second part of her name is clearly the ancient British (and modern Welsh and Breton) name "Arthur", that is "Ad"!

So, we have KING ARTHUR. Following that we have DIC and that's your root word found in almost all Indo-European languages for duke and dictator.

This is immediately followed by CA or CEA. (I favor the "hard C" pronunciation for the "c" sounds very much like the Romans themselves would do. No doubt that CA turns KING ARTHUR into a feminine form, and she becomes QUEEN ARTHUR. The "C" might also be a reference to the ICENI, her hereditary tribal affiliation before she became High King/Queen.

Turns the situation with Guinivere upside down doesn't it?

So, what is Mel Gibson going to do here? Is he going to make that leap of recognition that brings "King Arthur" out of the dark, and out of the hands of various "gay" playwrights who keep 'splainin' Arthur's tolerance of Lancelot's daliance with Guinivere as symptomatic of "gayness"!

Interestingly enough, once the Romans had pacified Brittain they brought in a legion made up of mercinaries from North of the Black Sea. These old boys had a memnonic "ring" about a king with a council circle and a wayward queen. Presumably that story was added to the repetoire of the times concerning the Queen who led the revolt against Rome.

11 posted on 06/02/2004 5:34:22 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Atreides
What we really need for Gibson's next project is a movie based on Charles "the hammer" Martel.

That'll really piss off the PC crowd.

13 posted on 06/02/2004 5:44:00 PM PDT by rmmcdaniell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Atreides
There is one thing that is perfectly clear...

No matter WHAT Gibson does in the film to portray the story, the left will gripe, bitch, complain, whine, and whimper.

They're still licking their wounds from "The Passion", and anything Mel does now will be suffer frame-by-frame critique. We already know that feminazis CANNOT be made happy, no matter what.

The worst message that Mel, or any of the rest of us can send to the feminazis is...that we CARE what they think about it. If the don't like the film, then they should just stay home - otherwise it's just an effort by them to CONTROL WHAT WE SEE.
14 posted on 06/02/2004 5:48:52 PM PDT by FrankR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Atreides

I like to see Gibson do something along the lines of the War of The Roses or Queen Maud vs. Steven.


16 posted on 06/02/2004 6:06:46 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (NEOCON NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Atreides
I was recently reading about her in Churchill's History of the English Speaking Peoples

Mel Gibson probably likes her for a subject because she is a sympathetic figure. She defends her country against the invaders and she causes massive casualties. Churchill said thousands and thousands slaughtered.

Mel's movies seem to gravitate toward bloody battles.

17 posted on 06/02/2004 6:16:19 PM PDT by agrarianlady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Atreides

I'm always game to see historical action on the screen, esp. from the beginning period of the British Isles.


22 posted on 06/02/2004 6:52:59 PM PDT by Ciexyz ("FR, best viewed with a budgie on hand")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Atreides

I nominate Angelina Jolie to play Boudicca.


23 posted on 06/02/2004 6:56:01 PM PDT by Ciexyz ("FR, best viewed with a budgie on hand")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson