Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: traumer

I'm a little confused here.

This is the first close up picture of a comet ever taken, AFAIK. But because they're seeing unexpected features, they're chalking it up to this comet being an aberration.

That is completely bassackwards. They should be examining their predictions and trying to see how the visual confirmation fit into current hypotheses. Instead they're throwing this one out as EXTRAordinary and keeping the old models intact.


4 posted on 06/18/2004 6:47:21 AM PDT by ruiner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ruiner

Sorry, just read a paragraph I must have missed.


6 posted on 06/18/2004 6:48:13 AM PDT by ruiner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: ruiner

What?

You got something against the comet head being made of dirty ice? :^)

I think you're right. Some concept revision appears to be indicated.


8 posted on 06/18/2004 6:55:23 AM PDT by Ole Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: ruiner
Of course they should, IF science, truth, and justice triumphed.
But then, government contracts may be at stake.
9 posted on 06/18/2004 6:56:41 AM PDT by Diogenesis (We do only what we are meant to do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: ruiner

Well said.


26 posted on 10/24/2004 2:35:54 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("All I have seen teaches me trust the Creator for all I have not seen." -- Emerson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson