In a criminal trial, the prosecution has to hand over any and all information it has or may use in the prosecution of its case; sometimes the defense can even ask the judge to order the prosecution to hand over certain items.
I have thought from the very beginning that having the blueprints of WTC would have helped them determine their fuel load and approach.
They should have never been tried in a criminal case.
Thanks for the background.
"I have thought from the very beginning that having the blueprints of WTC would have helped them determine their fuel load and approach."
They (rats) can plan their actions based upon what was 'discovered' by the comission. Isn't that standard operating procedures to let the other side know your evidence? If that was changed, and the defense or procesution could spring on surprise evidence, would that be a good or bad thing? I don't know that answer, asking legal minds out there.