Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

A long article with four pages and many photos (that I don't know how to transfer). Includes info on a libertarian delegate for Bush (sic), plus Karen Kwiatkowski, and more on that pro-lifer who was booed.

The booing wasn't nice, but I'm still voting for Michael Badnarik in 2004!

1 posted on 06/25/2004 6:07:04 PM PDT by Commie Basher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Commie Basher
As the three "major" [Libertarian] presidential contenders were nearly identical on issues (despite minor individual tweaks, all supported legalizing drugs, peace, foreign non-interventionism, abortion rights, gay marriage, and abolishing almost all taxes and government programs)

ROFL! What a bunch of liberal hippie morons!

2 posted on 06/25/2004 6:22:42 PM PDT by JohnnyZ (Yes, I do think I'm funny, why do you ask?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Commie Basher

We would expect nothing less of you, Commie.


3 posted on 06/25/2004 6:26:55 PM PDT by datura (Battlefield justice is what our enemies deserve. If you win, you live. If you lose, you die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Commie Basher

Third Party voting only works in the primaries. This is how it works. Say that the Democrats get 35% of the vote, the Communists get 2% of the vote, the Socialist Worker's Party gets 3% of the vote, the Greens get 6% of the vote, and the Libertarians get 2% of the vote. Then, in the general election, the Democratic candidate can look at the primary election results and say: "Gee. 13% of my important constituents feel really strongly about moral-liberal issues, so therefore I will alter my message accordingly in the general election!"


5 posted on 06/25/2004 7:30:48 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Commie Basher

The Libertarian Party is to politics what Scientology is to established Religion......


12 posted on 06/28/2004 9:17:13 AM PDT by Badeye ("The day you stop learning, is the day you begin dying")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Commie Basher

Victory or Death (Vanity)
Vanity | 3/14/2004 | tort_feasor


Posted on 03/14/2004 10:08:12 AM PST by tort_feasor


This November the people of the United States will make a choice between Victory and Death. My choice was made on September 11, 2001. My sister was working in One World Trade Center when Islamic Terrorists crashed a commercial Airliner 30 stories above her office. As she told me she heard a loud noise and then "papers and debris came floating past me." On that day I was blissfully unaware of the events for 45 minutes. I returned to my office to the words that cut off my breathing. "We are at war. The World Trade Center and Pentagon have been hit by planes." For over three hours, we waited for word on my sister's fate. I remebered calling frantically for news. Having my mother tell me that the south tower had collapsed and then that the North tower had collapsed also. When she did and we still had not heard from my sister I tried to face the inevitable loss. The anger and rage I have felt still burns. Thankfully just before noon, we heard from my sister's boyfriend. He had just talked to her and that she was going to a friend's house, unhurt. That weekend she relayed the horror of being caught in the World Trade Center. Of checking her office for anyone left behind. Slowly floor by floor descending the stairwellls. Seeing brave, tired firefighters climbing the same stairwells and sensing they were facing their doom. She related that as they neared the bottom, the stairwell was damaged and she had to cross a floor with no lights to reach another. She told of the water pooling on the steps and the seemingly endless trek downward. When she reached the exits, she told of the firefighters yelling to just run, don't look back. Minutes later One World Trade was added to the rubble pile of Ground Zero. Why do I recount this? I say this to everyone on Freerepublic that votes for John Kerry, or Libertarian or the Constitutional Party or even just stays home is voting against the man who is avenging 911 and is therefore implicitly supporting the very Islamic Terrorists that attempted to murder my sister along with the 50,000 other people in the World Trade Center that day. Now you may not like Bush for the Budget deficit. Fine I am not happy with the government spending but will Kerry be better? I don't think so. Is Medicare and the education department Unconstitutional? Under a strict reading yes, but voting along with 1 percent of all americans for the Consitutional Party isn't going to change the Supreme Court. And who will put better judges on The Courts,Bush or Kerry? Trust me I do respect the beliefs, opinions and right to express such ideas from those who have philosophical disagreements with the president. However, there are murdering madmen bent on doing to us what they almost did to my sister. We must Relect the president and wage unrelenting war until victory or elect Kerry and wait for our eventual defeat and death.


15 posted on 06/28/2004 9:26:34 AM PDT by tort_feasor ( anti-Semitism is not a lifestyle choice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Commie Basher

If they want to be take seriously, they need to have their Sh*t together a lot more. Otherwise get outta here.


17 posted on 06/28/2004 9:34:58 AM PDT by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Commie Basher; xzins; Polycarp IV
A long article with four pages and many photos (that I don't know how to transfer). Includes info on a libertarian delegate for Bush (sic), plus Karen Kwiatkowski, and more on that pro-lifer who was booed. The booing wasn't nice, but I'm still voting for Michael Badnarik in 2004!

Jeffrey Diket may not have been the only Pro-Life Libertarian in the race.

The gentleman who actually won the Libertarian Party nomination, Michael Badnarik, revealed recently in a June 17, 2004 interview with The Free Liberal that he has (like formerly pro-abortion Ronald Reagan?) changed his position on Abortion.

Badnarik confesses that he is now torn between the advocacy of "no abortions ever", and the position of judging "clinical life" by the standard of "at the beginning of brain activity" similarly to the medical standard of establishing Clinical Death (which would, theoretically, permit abortions prior to the 4th week of Pregnancy).

Regardless of his ongoing consideration of the legitimacy of early abortions (permissible before the onset of brain activity, or Always Wrong?), Badnarik appears to have consistently maintained throughout his campaign that Abortion -- like all Murder Law -- is properly a State's Right's issue.

If, therefore, he comes out with a strong Constitutionalist condemnation of Roe vs. Wade, and the resultant reversion of Abortion Law to the State Legislatures, he will be the 4th out of the last 5 Libertarian Party Presidential Nominees to advocate the overthrow of Roe vs. Wade.

Which is a nice trend to see developing amongst LP Presidential Nominees.

34 posted on 06/28/2004 11:25:18 PM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian (We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Commie Basher; xzins; Polycarp IV
But, I don’t think anyone’s willing to argue that the child doesn’t own his body until birth, because that would allow us to do partial birth abortions. And I don’t know anybody, who supports that view. ~~ Michael Badnarik

I suppose, then, Mr. Badnarik obviously doesn't know very many Democrats.

But it's nice to see that he recognizes that Partial-Birth Abortion is such a Moral Horror that he (perhaps naively) can't imagine that any rational human being would be so gutturally depraved as to countenance such an atrocity.

Good on ya, Mr. Badnarik.

35 posted on 06/28/2004 11:30:23 PM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian (We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Commie Basher

Ugh. I'll likely never vote Libertarian.


36 posted on 06/28/2004 11:34:38 PM PDT by k2blader (It is neither compassionate nor conservative to support the expansion of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Commie Basher; xzins; Polycarp IV
Incidentally, Michael Badnarik also does not support Homosexual Marriage.

Michael Badnarik supports the abolition of Government Marriage Licenses. This is a different position entirely.

Badnarik's solution would be to return the Institution of Marriage to the Realm of Private/Religious Contract (as it was in the days of Abraham and Sarah, Moses and Zipporah) with the Government serving only as the Enforcer of the terms of Private Contracts.

This is crucial -- because when you get right down to it, Homosexuals do not want lifetime, monogamous, mutual-commitment MARRIAGE. (If they really wanted to form a "Private Union" of Contractual Lifetime Monogamy, I bet I could find and appropriately modify the necessary "Business Partnership Forms" for less than $100 bucks by visiting any OfficeMax in the country). Homosexuals want the Legal Powers, Privileges, and Compulsory Social Acceptance which accrue from GOVERNMENT LICENSE of their "unions".

Take away the Government License, and Homosexual interest in Marriage will drop like a stone.

40 posted on 06/28/2004 11:51:02 PM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian (We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Commie Basher

It seems the LP vote has been relatively stable the past two or three Presidential election cycles (400K ?). What is your feeling about 2004?


49 posted on 06/29/2004 6:25:05 AM PDT by StumpyPete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson