Supposedly, the 'mos want the same rights as married people have...without the responsibilities, ie, of raising children. Those benefits include tax benefits, health benefits[which will rise because of their risky sexual behavior and must be borne by everyone] and the like. the reasons for those benefits is to promote stable families.
Single people should agitate for the same benefits. Afterall, what is the rational constitutional basis for excluding them from lower tax rates?
So the supposed "benefits" of marriage will be destroyed by approving 'mo marriages.
Adder, thank you for another logical reason why homosexual "marriages" or civil unions should not be legal.