[True Capitalist]

Bodansky is one of those guys-much like John Loftus-who has made his name off of a few insightful observations, while generally being wrong about most of the problems he is commissioned to solve.

Intel is more of an art than a science and there may be sources that had lied or assertions that later prove to be false, but I would like to know why you think Bodansky is generally wrong?

Looking at current world events I'd say Bodansky was 90% correct in a world where everyone else was 30% correct.

[The Scourge of Yazid]

If that's the case, then why haven't we hired Daniel Lieberskind to be the new director of the Central Intelligence Agency?

Just a thought.