To: dila813
That is a savings of 26,250 a year. I thought the article suggested his total bill had been $60k, and he was saving $45k/year...still a 20+ year undertaking.
I guess if the residue can be used as fertilizer without further processing, you might have another revenue stream.
To: fourdeuce82d
It says he saved 75% and it states his bill was reduced to about $15,000 a year.
It is then easy to do the math of a 58 year payback if you assume zero cost of cash with a zero interest rate.
Also, manure revenue stream doesn't require a 1.5million dollar investment even though it would generate more money than this venture detailed in this article even if it was free.
10 posted on
07/20/2004 6:53:01 PM PDT by
dila813
To: fourdeuce82d
I guess if the residue can be used as fertilizer without further processing, You can't spread manure on a field if the run off could enter a stream or the Water Quality Control Board will be on you with big fines. Did it say each of those systems received nearly a half million dollars of our tax money...
14 posted on
07/20/2004 7:27:17 PM PDT by
tubebender
(If I had known I would live this long I would have taken better care of myself...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson