Posted on 07/22/2004 9:17:06 PM PDT by neverdem
PING
Is that the times original headline? If so it's completely ridiculous.
Although if a ny times reporter or its editorial staff were willing to take a trip to a harmless black hole, I'd chip in a few bucks for the ride.
hrmn...
always wondered what happens when a singularity gets "full"
Hawking was wrong, yeah. So are those who swallow that silly 'big bang' theory.
How big of us to think we know what's what.
Odd that this coincides with the apparent retrieval of information from Sandy Berger's pants. A new universal constant?
So I guess the Black Hole kinda hurls eventually. A case of Cosmic gluttony I suppose. :)
LOL
| "If you jump into a black hole, your mass energy will be returned to our universe, but in a mangled form, which contains the information about what you were like, but in an unrecognizable state."
I'm glad Hawking did this, because I'm not very good at math. |
If it is full of enough Bud, would it soon be a "naked singularity"?
It has just been something I have long wondered at - I mean, if the conditions inside the event horizon are as horrific as math tells us they must be, wouldn't gravity itself sooner or later break down, causing the singularity to blowed up reeeeeal good?
gad, what an image.
I suppose this puts a dampener on the theory that the matter goes into another dimension, as some have theorized.
Whenever theorists or physicists speak in terms of infinites, you know they don't have a clue.
Also the BLack Hole could be that empty space where a normal human heart would be; but in their case its become VERY darkened by evil.
The relationship of gravity inside the event horizon would in essence break down in a Newtonian or relativistic system, as once past it your velocity should be above c. Once above c, relativity no longer works - so then what? Are you no longer able to be observed by someone in our reference plane? Of course you can't. So then it falls to the rules of quantum, and at this point it's anybody's guess.
What we know now, is only a drop in the largest ocean on earth.
When you look out into space, and you see a black hole, you are looking up the exit pipe, so to speak, of an item that is departing from your frame of reference, at a speed exceeding that of light.
In a similar vein, what is called a collapsing star, is a star born anew in another time zone. While we watch it collapse, some guy in the other time zone is watching it appear and can't wait to name it for himself.
Intergalactic intellectual property trial lawyers are foaming at the bit and can't wait to profit from these disputes.
Black holes are what happens when a star eats itself.
White holes are what happens when another universe farts.
Wormholes are black holes that can't make up their minds.
information about what happens inside some volume of space is somehow encoded on the surface of its boundary
Well now that's interesting, because all of what you see, what appears to be the volume of your space, is also the surface.
Everything that we see, is the surface of the volume of our space, what we call our universe.
There may or may not be a beach ball perimeter to it, but that is not the surface; it is only part of the surface.
A black hole is a hole in the surface.
So white holes are black holes suffering from Irritated Gravity Syndrome as a result of ingesting worms?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
Hawking lends theortical support to the theory I've been working on about Michael Moore. It's been obvious for some time that Michael Moore is an over-sized mass that consumes everything around him. But the problem was explaining how such a thing could radiate bogus information.