Posted on 07/30/2004 7:55:33 PM PDT by nuconvert
Researchers Say They Have Shark Repellent That 'really Works'
By Ian James/Associated Press
SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico (AP) - Excited by the scent of blood, a dozen sharks dart about in a frenzy as a researcher dips a pole in the sea and squirts out a clear, yellowish substance. Within seconds, the sharks jerk their snouts away and vanish. Researchers say they finally have found a potent repellent to drive away sharks, after testing off Bimini island in the Bahamas. It's a goal that's eluded scientists for decades.
If proven effective, the repellent one day might protect divers, surfers and swimmers. But researchers say that would require much more study and first they hope it can protect sharks - in decline worldwide due to overfishing - by reducing the numbers caught needlessly by long-line commercial fishermen.
"You introduce this chemical and they all leave," said lead researcher Eric Stroud, a 30-year-old chemical engineer from Oak Ridge, New Jersey. "It works very, very well."
The repellent, called A-2 because it was the second recipe tried, is derived from extracts of dead sharks that Stroud gathered at New Jersey fish markets and piers. Fishermen and scientists have long noted sharks stay away if they smell a dead shark.
"We have something that really works, but research remains," said Samuel Gruber, a University of Miami marine biologist and shark expert who is helping conduct tests at the Bimini Biological Field Station.
Gruber, 66, said the repellent seems to carry a chemical messenger that triggers a flight reaction - something seen before in fish such as perch, sculpin and minnows. He said more studies are needed to pinpoint the active molecule among a dozen or so.
Tests have found the repellent effective on four species: the Caribbean reef, blacknose, nurse and lemon sharks. Studies are needed on other species such as the great white, mako and oceanic whitetip.
A dose of 4 fluid ounces was enough to scare away feeding sharks, Stroud said, keeping them away from a fish head for two hours with just a few drops per minute. In contrast, sharks didn't respond to a red dye in control tests.
The researchers presented their work in May during a meeting of the American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists in Norman, Oklahoma. Films of their tests captured images of sharks splashing the surface as they turn to flee.
They hope to make a slow-dissolving repellent for use in baits and fishing nets, and to guard equipment on submarines and oil exploration vessels that sharks have damaged in the past.
The repellent, though nontoxic, is apparently so disagreeable to sharks it can revive them from semiconsciousness. Some species slip into a hypnotic state if turned belly-up, and tests found the repellent brought captive sharks out of that trance.
Repellent research began in World War II, when the U.S. Navy created "Shark Chaser" for sailors and downed pilots. Mixed with black dye, it was made of copper acetate, which scientists thought would smell like a rotting shark. Studies later showed it wasn't that effective.
A promising find came in 1972, when University of Maryland shark expert Eugenie Clark discovered that a Red Sea fish, the Moses sole, secreted a milky substance that repelled sharks.
The finding caused a stir, and soon the makers of Coppertone suntan lotion contacted Clark, hoping to market it. She said she discouraged them, saying initial research couldn't back up such a use.
Years of study followed by Gruber and others. In the end, though, the repellent derived from the sole wasn't practical because it had to be squirted into a shark's mouth to be effective.
Clark - who at 82 still works at Mote Marine Laboratory in Sarasota, Florida - said the latest findings could be a welcome way to reduce accidental killing of sharks, though she is skeptical of human use, saying few would be carrying the repellent at the rare moment it's needed.
"I'd be happy to see somebody work it out, but I don't see it as a practical solution," she said.
Anti-shark items on the market now include cages, steel mesh suits and a device called the Shark Shield, which when worn by divers or surfers emits an electric field. The device's Australian maker acknowledges it can't guarantee total effectiveness.
In most cases, the danger of attack is extremely slight. The International Shark Attack File, at the Florida Museum of Natural History, recorded 55 unprovoked attacks worldwide last year, including four deaths.
Stroud got the idea to pursue a repellent after several 2001 shark attacks drew widespread attention, including one that nearly killed an 8-year-old boy near Pensacola, Florida.
Stroud and engineer Mike Herrmann do lab work in a New Jersey warehouse, relying on donations of less than $500,000 from two private benefactors.
They have a patent pending and are starting a company, Shark Defense Inc., to eventually market the repellent.
They've had shark repellent for YEARS. Did the old stuff not work? That's a little disturbing when you think about it.
Does it work on lawyers?
Tell it to the crew of the USS Indianapolis.
Sharks ate most of them.
Batman already had this, circa 1968. Where have these guys been?
Does it use a 12 gauge shotgun shell?
I guess the old stuff wasn't quite as reliable
I was going to write that as the 1st comment, but knew it wouldn't be long before someone else did.
That was a grizzly episode.
I can't see your photo. Have you seen the movie? It's awesome 60s camp.
Would that be too late for shark repellant?
Wanna bet ?
Beaches could buy this stuff by the gallon and just drop mortar modules of this stuff about 100 yards off the shore and no more sharks for a few hours
Will it have a money back guarantee.If not I wont buy it.
Suuuuuuuuuurrrrrrrrrrrre
There's nothing new under the sun, you know.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.