Posted on 08/06/2004 10:41:20 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
WASHINGTON, Aug. 6 - A top House Democrat called on Attorney General John Ashcroft on Friday to explain why the Justice Department was letting federal officials cooperate in a Congressional inquiry into the case of Samuel R. Berger despite a current criminal investigation.
The representative, Henry A. Waxman of California, the senior Democrat on the Government Reform Committee, said the department position regarding Mr. Berger, a national security adviser to President Bill Clinton accused of mishandling classified documents, was at odds with how inquiries tied to the Bush administration had been handled.
"For example, in the investigation into the leak of the identity of covert C.I.A. agent Valerie Plame, officials have said repeatedly that they cannot comment because the matter is currently under investigation," Mr. Waxman wrote. He said the policy was "intended to maintain the integrity of the investigation and protect the individuals involved."
The panel chairman, Representative Tom Davis, Republican of Virginia, called on the National Archives and Records Administration this week to provide materials related to Mr. Berger, who has acknowledged improperly removing documents from the archives last year but has said it was inadvertent.
Among the items Mr. Davis sought were internal archives communications about Mr. Berger's actions as well as the documents that granted him access to the classified papers while he prepared for an appearance before the Sept. 11 commission.
"The unauthorized removal of such documents raises serious questions as to N.A.R.A. procedures and policies in place to protect such important records and raises specific questions as to whether the 9/11 commission received all relevant requested documents," Mr. Davis wrote in a letter on Wednesday.
Mr. Davis's determination to investigate the Berger case has created a dispute with Mr. Waxman and other Democrats. They accuse the chairman and the House Republican leadership of applying a double standard since they have rejected Democrats' calls to look into the disclosure of Ms. Plame's identity and other matters related to Iraq.
Mr. Davis and his allies reject the assertion of unfairness. A committee spokesman said the investigation of Mr. Berger's handling of the classified documents went beyond the criminal aspect into questions of security at the archives, a matter under the panel's jurisdiction.
"We are collecting information," the spokesman, Robert White, said. "If we feel a hearing is necessary, we will have one."
In his letter to the Justice Department, Mr. Waxman said the House committee staff was initially told by prosecutors and archives officials that they could not provide details of the case because of the investigation. But he said more senior department officials reversed that position after being asked to intervene by Republican committee aides.
Mr. Waxman said archives officials were scheduled to be questioned by House investigators on Wednesday and had been told they were "in no way constrained" from talking about the details with lawmakers or their aides. Mr. Waxman asked Mr. Ashcroft to explain why the prosecutors were overruled and whether he would "similarly 'clear' " officials to discuss other cases, like Ms. Plame's.
Mark Corallo, a spokesman for the Justice Department, said he could say nothing about the letter from Mr. Waxman other than "we will review Congressman Waxman's letter as we do all Congressional requests."
I'm going to implore my parents to cancel their subscription to the NYtimes. I'm really tired of this crap.
So the Democrats are mad that Ashcroft is allowing the investigation of Sandy Burglar to be too transparent?
LOL.
If he didn't allow Congress any input on this they would say he was covering up so he could frame Burglar...
WAXMAN ALERT!
Nostrilitis Waxwoman is my congresswussie.
Boy do I feel sorry for you, this man is not only the most partisan representative, he is down right dispicable and will tell any lie.
Oh, hell, let's give Henry something to show everybody's being treated equally: seat a grand jury for Berger!
Sounds fair to me,, let's present the facts and let the chips fall where they may.
Get a load of this!
Despicable isn't the word for Waxman. He's beyond description. Total scum.
Yep - can't let those law enforcement officials cooperate with just anyone!
Waxman is upset because Ashcroft is cooperating??
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
They are scared out of the Bleeping Minds over this issue with Berger
indictment right before election.. sandy doing the perp waddle
Oh, the headlines .. ;-)
Kerry National Security Adviser Indicted, Multiple Counts
I FReeped his @$$, I mean, NOSTRILS, in Westlake Village, CA about three or four months ago. He was having a fundraiser, OUT OF HIS DISTRICT, with about 40 people, and I stuck my head in the door and called him a liberal scumbag, and then pointed my finger and sneered through the window, interrupting his speech, and distracting everyscum listening to his @$$-clown-ness.
Who is "Nostrildamus"? Does he predict future boogers?
Enough nicey-nicey; charge Berger with multiple violations of National Security regulations regarding handling and transport of Sensitive Compartmented Information, slap the cuffs on him and ship him off to Levenworth for the next twenty years. Let the Rats scream and yell, and meanwhile find out who else was told what's in the info Berger removed (make a deal with Sandy, either that or spend the rest of his life with a roommate named Bubba).
When you have the names of the people Sandy revealed the info to, nail them too. Don't stop until every Rat on the Hill who ever heard anything that they didn't have clearance or need to know hides and hopes that the angel of doom passes over.
Sock? He could put two shoes in there!
Sooooo .. what has Ashcroft been commenting about .. I haven't heard him say anything about Berger ..?? What have I missed ..??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.