Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem
S. 1431


THIS SEARCH     THIS DOCUMENT     GO TO
Next Hit        Forward           New Bills Search
Prev Hit        Back              HomePage
Hit List        Best Sections     Help
                Contents Display   

GPO's PDF Display Congressional Record References Bill Summary & Status Printer Friendly Display - 14,841 bytes.[Help]

Assault Weapons Ban and Law Enforcement Protection Act of 2003 (Introduced in Senate)

S 1431 IS

108th CONGRESS

1st Session

S. 1431

To reauthorize the assault weapons ban, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

July 17, 2003

Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself and Mr. CORZINE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary


A BILL

To reauthorize the assault weapons ban, and for other purposes.

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

SEC. 3. ELIMINATION OF SUNSET.

SEC. 4. GRANDFATHER PROVISIONS.

SEC. 5. REPEAL OF CERTAIN EXEMPTIONS.

SEC. 6. REQUIRING BACKGROUND CHECKS FOR THE TRANSFER OF LAWFULLY POSSESSED SEMIAUTOMATIC ASSAULT WEAPONS.

SEC. 7. STRENGTHENING THE BAN ON THE POSSESSION OR TRANSFER OF A LARGE CAPACITY AMMUNITION FEEDING DEVICE.

SEC. 8. UNLAWFUL WEAPONS TRANSFERS TO JUVENILES.

SEC. 9. BAN ON IMPORTATION OF LARGE CAPACITY AMMUNITION FEEDING DEVICE.



THIS SEARCH     THIS DOCUMENT     GO TO
Next Hit        Forward           New Bills Search
Prev Hit        Back              HomePage
Hit List        Best Sections     Help

                Contents Display   


5 posted on 08/16/2004 10:58:26 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn't be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Blood of Tyrants

Orwellian title. It has nothing to do with protecting law enforcement. And its easy enough to get around the ban by modifying or removing prohibited features. The entire proposal is a joke and a waste of taxpayers' money. Not to mention that it guts the 2nd Amendment.


7 posted on 08/16/2004 11:03:02 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Blood of Tyrants
That had better die in committee. If it passes, and Bush has promised to sign it should it reach his desk, then consider the curtain closed on the American Experiment.

Badnarik will get my vote. From alienating so much of his conservative base, Bush will lose the election. And civil war will probably result.

The future just got a lot bleaker. I've already e-mailed my Reps and Senators for all the good it'll do.

8 posted on 08/16/2004 11:03:38 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Blood of Tyrants
SEC. 5. REPEAL OF CERTAIN EXEMPTIONS.

Section 922(v)(3) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking `(3)' and all that follows through the end of the first sentence and inserting the following:

`(3) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any firearm that--

`(A) is manually operated by bolt, pump, level, or slide action;

Is there going to be a stampede to buy new level actions so there will be more blood on the streets like cowboys in the Old West or drive-bys in the 'hood?

21 posted on 08/16/2004 12:21:07 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Blood of Tyrants
Ain't that cute, putting someone in jail for 10 freakin' YEARS for transferring a magazine (see section 7)

I also like this section:

(L) A semiautomatic rifle or shotgun originally designed for military or law enforcement use, or a firearm based on the design of such a firearm, that is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, as determined by the Attorney General. In making the determination, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that a firearm procured for use by the United States military or any Federal law enforcement agency is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, and a firearm shall not be determined to be particularly suitable for sporting purposes solely because the firearm is suitable for use in a sporting event.'.

Goodbye, M-1 Garand, M1A, etc. Same for pretty much any semi-auto rifle or shotgun (what hasn't been procured for "use" by the military or the Fibbies? Every gun must be procured by them for SOME use).

These people can Forbes themselves.

23 posted on 08/16/2004 12:26:47 PM PDT by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson