Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Blood of Tyrants
I wouldn't put it past them to arm some deranged lunatic with an "assault weapon" and turn him loose on the streets just to drum up more support

I figured The Beltway snipers using the Bushmaster would have been enough; notice how fast the main stream commie press dropped the whole issue when they found out the guys who did it were a Black Muslim and his butt boy instead of some crazy, rednecked white supremacist? If anything the fact that these guys had sympathy with MOOOslim Terrorists, and that the random sniping was right out of the Al-queda playbook, was a lesson that maybe, just maybe, a well-armed citizenry was a good idea. That's why the commies don't bring the episode up as a 'poster child' for gun control.

33 posted on 08/19/2004 11:43:19 AM PDT by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: 45Auto
45Auto said: "I figured The Beltway snipers using the Bushmaster would have been enough;"

Another reason for this incident not getting traction with the anti-gunners is that the rifle used was undoubtedly a post-ban gun. It was probably missing a bayonet lug, a flash suppressor, a grenade launcher, and a collapsible stock. It probably had a pistol grip.

The anti-gunners could have found themselves having to explain how the AWB failed to regulate what they are claiming justified the law. Further, they would have to explain how relevant the military features and appearance of a rifle fired from hiding in single-shot mode would contribute to the sniper's success. There has never been a hunting rifle made that would not have been just as effective.

36 posted on 08/19/2004 12:05:41 PM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson