Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Elsie; AndrewC; jennyp; lockeliberty; RadioAstronomer; LiteKeeper; Fester Chugabrew; ...

Ping!


25 posted on 08/21/2004 9:33:13 PM PDT by bondserv (Alignment is critical! †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: bondserv

Thanks for the ping!


26 posted on 08/21/2004 9:38:56 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: bondserv
Posted by bondserv to Jaguar1942
On News/Activism 08/18/2004 4:10:48 PM PDT · 660 of 1,102

...We are finding the standard interpretations of the fossil record are highly suspect. Much deception has been and continues to go on.

Posted by balrog666 to bondserv
On News/Activism 08/18/2004 4:13:30 PM PDT · 663 of 1,102

Much deception has been and continues to go on.

That's called "religion".

27 posted on 08/21/2004 9:41:21 PM PDT by bondserv (Alignment is critical! †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: bondserv
Thanks for the ping. I lost your alert in the chaff of another discussion. So, I apologize for the delay in acknowledging your note. Thanks again!

We appear to have a set of bones, previously identified as neanderthal and umpteen thousand years old, now in question as to dating. If the new dating is used, the bones are too young to be identified as neanderthal. If the old dating is used, we must accept the results from an emerging charlatan over those developed by individuals at Oxford. Take your choice.(Well, maybe to some there is a third choice, they are all mistaken)

132 posted on 08/25/2004 10:06:31 AM PDT by AndrewC (I am a Bertrand Russell agnostic, even an atheist.</sarcasm>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson