Skip to comments.
Militants: 12 Nepalese killed (Religion of Peace kills again...)
CNN ^
| August 30 2004
Posted on 08/31/2004 6:57:48 AM PDT by Pitiricus
An Islamic Web site has posted gruesome still images and videos of what it says is the killing of 12 Nepalese hostages by a militant group in Iraq.
Footage posted on Tuesday showed one beheading and 11 others apparently shot from an assault rifle at the back of the head.
The video shows a masked man in desert camouflage apparently slitting the throat of a blindfolded man lying on the ground, The Associated Press reported.
The blindfolded man moans and a shrill wheeze is heard, then the masked man displays the head to the camera before resting it on the decapitated body.
CNN is working to confirm the authenticity of the images. The still images appear to have been taken from the video.
The Nepalese Foreign Ministry in Kathmandu said it had no official confirmation of what appears to have taken place...
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: beheading; killers; muslims; nepal; nepalese
Islam at work!
1
posted on
08/31/2004 6:57:49 AM PDT
by
Pitiricus
To: Pitiricus
Do not alter the title please. Thanks.
To: Admin Moderator
Sorry... Didn't know that...
3
posted on
08/31/2004 7:01:56 AM PDT
by
Pitiricus
To: Pitiricus
Such a fun loving bunch, truly the way to recruit more converts......
4
posted on
08/31/2004 7:07:34 AM PDT
by
Pondman88
To: Pitiricus
ROP my a$$.
5
posted on
08/31/2004 7:14:08 AM PDT
by
Dallas59
To: Pitiricus
In modern times I haven't herd of Christians or Buddhists running around whacking of heads, executing people, blowing up buses or trains. With Muslims it's almost an everyday occurrence, even their religious leaders like Al Sadr are blood thirsty barbarians. The clerics here in the states have not denounced the terrorist acts of 9-11. They wouldn't even denounce the beheading of Mark Berg. One thing you can be sure of the Muslims will try to act all Innocent in spite of their hidden savagery.
6
posted on
08/31/2004 7:17:06 AM PDT
by
solsrchr2
(solsrchr2)
To: Dallas59
In 1951, the Nepalese monarch ended the century-old system of rule by hereditary premiers and instituted a cabinet system of government.
Reforms in 1990 established a multiparty democracy within the framework of a constitutional monarchy. A Maoist insurgency, launched in 1996, has gained traction and is threatening to bring down the regime.
In 2001, the Crown Prince massacred ten members of the royal family, including the king and queen, and then took his own life. In October 2002, the new king dismissed the prime minister and his cabinet for "incompetence" after they dissolved the parliament and were subsequently unable to hold elections because of the ongoing insurgency.
The country is now governed by the king and his appointed cabinet, which has negotiated a cease-fire with the Maoist insurgents until elections can be held at some unspecified future date.
7
posted on
08/31/2004 7:18:47 AM PDT
by
Dallas59
To: mylife
8
posted on
08/31/2004 7:19:13 AM PDT
by
ozaukeemom
(Nuke the ACLU and their snivel rights!)
To: Pitiricus
OK, enlighten me.
Why in the WORLD would the Republicans launch their convention with an invocation by an adherent to this rabid warrior death cult???!!!!
.
9
posted on
08/31/2004 7:19:29 AM PDT
by
Westbrook
To: Pitiricus
10
posted on
08/31/2004 7:20:01 AM PDT
by
ChadGore
(Vote Bush. He's Earned It.)
To: solsrchr2
YOU CAN'T BLAME ISLAM/MUSLIMS FOR THE WRONGS DONE BY FEW PEOPLE. EVERYWHERE THERE ARE RADICAL GROUPS AND THEY DONT BELONG TO ANY RELEGION.
11
posted on
09/03/2004 5:46:40 AM PDT
by
amer0512
To: amer0512
You missed a very important part of what I wrote.
"The clerics here in the states have not denounced the terrorist acts of 9-11. They wouldn't even denounce the beheading of Mark Berg."
Do you understand how the term CLERIC is being used here. It is being used to identify LEADERS in the ISLAM/MUSLIM communities here in the United States. When leaders of a group fail to publicly denounce such things, then it is reasonably safe assume that they privately approve. And if you don't believe that take a trip a No Spin Zone and reread this post.
Furhter more if radical Christians were committing terrorist acts I would be the biggest informer around. If Radical Christians were perverting my faith I would cut them out like a cancer. Any ISLAMIC/MUSLIM who allows others to pervert their faith is not being true to ISLAM. So can responsibility be laid at the feet of those who choose not to protect their religion, you bet it can. A religious leader or CLERIC, who does not rise up against those perverting their religion should be removed. A responsible CLERIC would ask his followers to actively cooperate with authorities. I don't see any of this going on. DO YOU?
12
posted on
09/08/2004 9:16:02 AM PDT
by
solsrchr2
(solsrchr2)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson