Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/10/2004 6:03:39 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: NormsRevenge
I think Clinton would have been to busy sharing his cigar to be bother by something as trivial as Mullah Omar
2 posted on 09/10/2004 6:10:50 PM PDT by Conservative_boy_in_Bangkok (I'm as mad as Zell and I'm not going to take it anymore!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

That is just *weird*.


3 posted on 09/10/2004 6:10:54 PM PDT by Sharpie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

So that's Mr.Clinton .


4 posted on 09/10/2004 6:13:45 PM PDT by Nepalis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
Little came of the contact, although Mullah Mohammed Omar counseled the department that the United States would never be accepted as a friend of the Muslims unless Congress forced Clinton to resign.

Remember when Clinton was being impeached, the argument was "how much damage can he do in 2 years"? THIS MUCH...

5 posted on 09/10/2004 6:17:54 PM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

(In another section, Malinowski wrote, "He said that in order to rebuild U.S. popularity in the Islamic world and because of (Clinton's) current domestic difficulties Congress should force President Clinton to resign.")

Seems to me that Omar had the right idea.


6 posted on 09/10/2004 6:46:52 PM PDT by wizr (Without the War on Terror, you only have the Terror. Ask a Russian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Now let me get this straight...AP tells us that the crowd booed when President Bush announced that Slick had a heart problem, right?

And that was proven a lie but AP refused to apologize or even issue a correction, right? (And I recall reading that the editor of AP said, about that, "Why should I?")

And now we are supposed to believe this crap from AP, right?

I don't think so...let's get another source we can trust...maybe al Jazeera?


7 posted on 09/10/2004 7:30:51 PM PDT by lancer (If you are not with us, you are against us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

"The message, drafted by Michael E. Malinowski, then the head of the State Department's Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh desk, reported what is believed to be the first and perhaps only U.S. contact with the rabidly anti-American Muslim cleric."

Tecnically not true. The one-eyed mullah had some contact with American bomb fragments in Afghanistan, just not enough of it :)


9 posted on 09/10/2004 7:37:22 PM PDT by Wolfhound777 (It's not our job to forgive them. Only God can do that. Our job is to arrange the meeting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
And we "learn" this six years later? Imagine what info we aren't given to chew on? I know that the USA had official and unofficial dialog with the Taliban regime. Heck, our own government was spit as to having them be the government of Afghanistan so we could make some deals.

The key to this story is the former Taliban Foreign Minister who wanted to deal with the US. He is known to have delt with Tahir Yildash a Uzbekistan terrorist who wanted the US not to bomb them off the face of the Earth.

10 posted on 09/10/2004 7:39:39 PM PDT by endthematrix (STAND BY........New Tag Line In Progress..........STAND BY......New Tag Line in)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dead

fyi


11 posted on 09/10/2004 8:09:59 PM PDT by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fedora; Shermy; Howlin; cyncooper
The message was provided to The Associated Press by the National Security Archive, an independent nongovernmental research group based at George Washington University that collects previously secret government documents. The archive said it obtained the document through a Freedom of Information Act request.

Hmmm. Clinton resume padding from Sandy Berger's pants-stuffing days?

12 posted on 02/14/2005 9:40:34 PM PST by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge; Mo1; Howlin

Don't miss this one...


15 posted on 02/14/2005 10:07:14 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland; ALOHA RONNIE; jwalsh07

ping!


16 posted on 02/14/2005 10:08:26 PM PST by nutmeg (democRATs = The Party of NO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

22 posted on 02/14/2005 10:17:40 PM PST by nutmeg (democRATs = The Party of NO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

To much , but then again we are talking Mr.Bill .


28 posted on 02/14/2005 10:51:13 PM PST by Deetes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson