Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: USMCVIETVET
2 posted on
09/11/2004 10:55:07 AM PDT by
USMCVIETVET
(Kerry No Special Friend to Jews or Israel)
To: USMCVIETVET
To: USMCVIETVET
When you have to use Nazi-esque insults in a debate, you have already lost.
4 posted on
09/11/2004 10:57:28 AM PDT by
toupsie
To: USMCVIETVET
I notice the critics of the Swift Boat Veterans always conveniently fail to point out that the Kerry campaign had to admit that there "problems" in Kerry's statements and background: like the Cambodia incident and the first purple heart.
Keep on SBVT. It's working. Big time.
5 posted on
09/11/2004 10:58:02 AM PDT by
putupjob
To: USMCVIETVET
6 posted on
09/11/2004 10:58:22 AM PDT by
SunStar
(Democrats piss me off!)
To: USMCVIETVET
What is with the dnc and their infactuation with all things NAZI?
Old story - but worth repeating:
Read closely, and be honest with yourself as you answer along with these students.
In previous years, and on the first day of class, I have given my new students a ballot, indicating that "it is time to elect the leader of a great nation," and offering them two candidates, A and B.
Candidate A is identified as "a well-known critic of government, this man has been involved in tax protest movements, and has openly advocated secession, armed rebellion against the existing national government, and even the overthrow of that government. He is a known member of a militia group that was involved in a shoot-out with law enforcement authorities. He opposes gun control efforts of the present national government, as well as restrictions on open immigration into this country. He is a businessman who has earned his fortune from such businesses as alcohol, tobacco, retailing, and smuggling."
Candidate B is described thusly: "A decorated army war veteran, this man is an avowed nonsmoker and dedicated public health advocate. His public health interests include the fostering of medical research and his dedication to eliminating cancer. He opposes the use of animals in conducting such research. He has supported restrictions on the use of asbestos, pesticides, and radiation, and favors government-determined occupational health and safety standards, as well as the promotion of such foods as whole-grain bread and soybeans. He is an advocate of government gun-control measures. An ardent opponent of tobacco, he has supported increased restrictions on both the use of and advertising for tobacco products. Such advertising restrictions include:
[1] not allowing tobacco use to be portrayed as harmless or a sign of masculinity;
[2] not allowing such advertising to be directed to women;
[3] not drawing attention to the low nicotine content of tobacco products; and,
[4] limitations as to where such advertisements may be made.
This man is a champion of environmental and conservationist programs, and believes in the importance of sending troops into foreign countries in order to maintain order therein."
The students are asked to vote, anonymously, for either of these two candidates. I employ this exercise only every other year, at most, so that students will not have been told to expect it. Over the years, the voting results have given candidate B about 75% of the vote, while candidate A gets the remaining 25%.
After completing the exercise and tabulating the results, I inform the students that candidate A is a composite of the American "founding fathers" (e.g., Sam Adams, John Hancock, Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, etc.). Candidate B, on the other hand, is Adolf Hitler, whose advocacy for the programs named can be found in such works as Robert Proctor's The Nazi War on Cancer.
< snip >
The above article was titled ...
The Hitler Test
by Butler Shaffer
26 September 2003
Butler Shaffer teaches at the Southwestern University School of Law.
7 posted on
09/11/2004 10:59:12 AM PDT by
steplock
To: USMCVIETVET
I'm surpirsed that more Jews aren't furious with the analogies that the Democrats have been making between Bush and Hitler. Not only is it obviously completely false...it is a slap in the face to anyone who suffered under the tyranny and brutality of the Third Reich. When they attack Bush in this way, they marginalize just what it was that Hitler did to these people.
9 posted on
09/11/2004 11:00:16 AM PDT by
cwb
(John Kerry: Still attacking Vietnam Vets after 35 years.)
To: USMCVIETVET
If Sanders thinks he's right, why doesn't he sue O'Neill. O'Neill has said to go ahead and sue him. No one has, including Kerry and the "sue-happy" DNC.
I'ts obvious that Kerry's followers have lost the argument when they start invoking any reference to Nazi's and Hitler.
That should speak volumes to those who care to listen.
11 posted on
09/11/2004 11:00:50 AM PDT by
NavySEAL F-16
(Proud to be a Reagan Republican)
To: USMCVIETVET
Kerry Vet Leader Likens O'Neill to Goebbels "Buzz" Patterson is really Keith Olbermann?!? :-)
13 posted on
09/11/2004 11:02:41 AM PDT by
Freepdonia
(Victory is Ours!)
To: USMCVIETVET
Kerry Vet Leader Likens O'Neill to Goebbels
"Buzz" Patterson is really Keith Olbermann?!? :-)
14 posted on
09/11/2004 11:04:00 AM PDT by
Freepdonia
(Victory is Ours!)
To: USMCVIETVET
Hitler in the sense of "snappy dresser" or Hitler in the sense of politics?
I mean, Nazis were National Socialists sort of like how Nancy Pelosi belongs to that National organization for American Socialists. Democrats and Nazis goose step to the same political beat these days it seems. They have even got their own reincarnated version of Goebbels in the abundant form of Michael Moore.
At any rate, whatever the rats seems to come up these days seems to fall into the the old "I'm rubber you're glue" formula. Why do they even bother?
16 posted on
09/11/2004 11:06:00 AM PDT by
Caipirabob
(Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
To: USMCVIETVET
Apparently Sanders wasn't one of the ones tortured because of Kerry's testimony.
18 posted on
09/11/2004 11:06:39 AM PDT by
doug from upland
(Dan Rather is a journalist like Michael Moore is a pole vaulter.)
To: USMCVIETVET
The attacks by Kerry and his minions against the Swiftees show one thing: Kerry's entire political career has been built on the sand of fraud and treason. He sees his hopes of gaining control of the US for the sake of the UN slipping away from him as more and more of the truth about him becomes known.
Personally, I will not slam Kerry for serving in the Navy, nor for the probablity of his decorations being fraudulently obtained. That is for someone who knows more about those circumstances than I do. I will, however, be critical of Kerry for his activities following his return from Vietnam. His actions as a member of a Communist front group, his false statements before the Senate, and his continual adherance to enemies of the US (NVN, NK, the UN, Saddam Hussein, et. al.) ARE subjects of legitimate criticism, and raise questions as to whether he would be serving the people of the US, or Kofi Annan were he to be elected President.
My own military service was ultimately inconsequential compared to many, but I NEVER turned my back to my country, nor to those I served alongside, and I never will. I cannot bear to think of a traitor, for that is what he is, such as Kerry occupying the same office held by George Washington, Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, U.S. Grant, Theodore Roosevelt, and Ronald Reagan. The idea that a traitor would claim the title borne by honorable military men such as William Henry Harrison, Zachary Taylor, Benjamin Harrison, James A. Garfield, R.B. Hayes, William McKinley, Harry Truman, Dwight Eisenhower, J.F. Kennedy and Gerald Ford is offensive to me....and deeply so.
For the sake of our country, for its soverignty and for our precious liberties, John Kerry MUST be defeated!
23 posted on
09/11/2004 11:14:44 AM PDT by
Bombardier
(SAC: Mission accomplished, but a command we now need more than ever.)
To: Howlin; eddie willers; cajungirl; wirestripper; Southflanknorthpawsis; Peach; prairiebreeze; ...
Let's tell Wade Sanders that comparing John O'Neill to a Nazi propagandist goes just a tad over the line...
To: USMCVIETVET
SOmebody needs to send Sanders a copy of John Kerry's book, the one he wrote back in the 70's called 'The New Soldier'.
Sanders would follow THIS MAN into battle?
Where.....a street fight outside a Paris restaurant?
30 posted on
09/11/2004 11:30:14 AM PDT by
Republic
(Terri Schiavo,saved by TERRI's LAW after 7 days of starvation, fights ACLU-Felos to keep law intact)
To: USMCVIETVET
As a side note I was in SF on Market street yesterday at noon. The Kerry supporters (about 30-50+) were out with a number of TV crews doing interviews. I though of counter FReeping but I don't think my boss wanted to see me on TV.
32 posted on
09/11/2004 11:33:22 AM PDT by
Drango
(What's the Font, Kenneth")
To: USMCVIETVET
California not in play, huh? Then why is Kerry in SF trying to shore up the base? Frisco should be solid for Kerry.
33 posted on
09/11/2004 11:33:41 AM PDT by
telebob
To: SJackson; Alouette; dennisw
38 posted on
09/11/2004 11:40:13 AM PDT by
Fiddlstix
(This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
To: USMCVIETVET
Does anyone have the e-mail address for The Jerusalem Post? This needs to be e-mailed to them. They are trying to change the Jewish vote majority from Dims to pubbies this year.
39 posted on
09/11/2004 11:42:30 AM PDT by
no dems
(The BC/'04 Campaign needs to monitor this website.)
To: USMCVIETVET
What do they mean:
"Swift Boat Veterans for Truth co-founder John O'Neill, author of "Unfit for Command," again aired his claims that Kerry not only conflated his own record in Vietnam for political gain but also smeared other veterans' reputations while speaking out against the war after his return.
Kerry is on tape with his accusations against those fighting in Vietnam!
41 posted on
09/11/2004 11:48:56 AM PDT by
FairOpinion
(FIGHT TERRORISM! VOTE BUSH/CHENEY 2004.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson