Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/17/2004 1:20:07 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: JohnHuang2

Procter would like to think of itself as a good corporate citizen, and it is indeed very generous. But part of good citizenship is having a real ethical basis for your decisions, and taking responsibility for what your largess ultimately supports. Way, way too often P$G hands out money to destructive local groups just to get them to go away from their Ivory Towers.


2 posted on 09/17/2004 1:30:50 AM PDT by nkycincinnatikid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

Procter would like to think of itself as a good corporate citizen, and it is indeed very generous. But part of good citizenship is having a real ethical basis for your decisions, and taking responsibility for what your largess ultimately supports. Way, way too often P$G hands out money to destructive local groups just to get them to go away from their Ivory Towers.


3 posted on 09/17/2004 1:31:23 AM PDT by nkycincinnatikid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Cincinnati-based Procter & Gamble should be boycotted for its efforts to overturn a local law barring special rights to homosexuals, says Focus on the Family founder and chairman James Dobson.

That's all I need to read. In my opinion, James Dobson is as good as gold. Boycott it is.
4 posted on 09/17/2004 1:38:06 AM PDT by Jaysun (The probability of someone watching you is proportional to the stupidity of your action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

Procter and Gamble has been a "progressive", (read leftist),
corporate bully for years.
They've managed to keep a low profile until recently, but they've always been in the shadows, pulling strings for a long time.
Their most noxious act of snobbery was to have a low cost hamburger establishment torn down so the local, indigent "trash" wouldn't be seen close to their new (then)
corporate site.
They bought the hamburger business, tore it down, and built a parking lot, which was next to their multi-story parking lot across the street.......


6 posted on 09/17/2004 3:10:55 AM PDT by libwacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

bttt


7 posted on 09/17/2004 3:19:53 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
RELATED, with a looonnnnng list of P&G products.

FGS

8 posted on 09/17/2004 3:45:39 AM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

Gave up on them long ago. Arm and Hammer is listed by Consumer Reports to be an excellent laundry soap- and it is.


9 posted on 09/17/2004 3:53:48 AM PDT by KeyWest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2; Alamo-Girl; betty boop; Dr. Eckleburg; P-Marlowe; MEG33

The best way to injure P&G is to point out that their products are not significantly better in quality and cost anywhere from 2 to 3 times as much as products that are just as adequate.

This is true of everything from Tide to Crest.

A whispering campaign about how expensive they are would be far more effective in injuring them.

So Dobson should not simply say, "Boycott Tide & Crest." He should say, "Folks, it is easy to boycott Tide & Crest because they COST significantly more than the other products, anyway. Join our boycott and YOU WILL SAVE money."

Incidentally, when in college I worked at one of P&G's tech labs in Cincy. (I have a degree of loyalty to them remaining, but they need to butt out of SOCIAL politics in the city.) But my job at the time put me in the direct position of comparing the performance of their products vs competitive products.

Many don't realize it, but if you could wash your clothing in distilled water, you'd get them just about as clean as with detergent. What you'd miss is the brightening agents.

There simply isn't that much difference between products. Not when 100 oz of one is on the shelf at 2.99 and Tide is on the shelf at 6.99. It's simple brand advertising that gets people to pay that much for a negligible cleaning difference.


11 posted on 09/17/2004 5:40:47 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army and Proudly Supporting BUSH/CHENEY 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

It's gonna be tough to boycott them since they make everything on the planet.


13 posted on 09/17/2004 5:43:17 AM PDT by Flightdeck (Ted Kennedy is a disgusting toad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

I've been boycotting them for years for changing the formula for Head & Shoulders. I was a loyal customer for 25 years and felt pretty crapped on when they ruined my product. I can see adding variations, but keep the original for crying out loud.


15 posted on 09/17/2004 8:31:00 AM PDT by Manic_Episode (Dan is a psycho arrogant political hack with no journalistic ethics or integrity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Modernman

Ping. Tide keeps my whites white and colors colored. Considering my modest domestic abilities, that transcends politics.


20 posted on 09/17/2004 10:10:13 AM PDT by BroncosFan (NJ 2005: Schundler for Governor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

This brings up a point that is often overlooked - the fact that a shocking number of major corporations are quite leftist in nature. The list of supporters of racial preferences who sided (and ultimately won) with the University of Michigan in the Grutter decision included many from the Fortune 500 in addition to the ususal suspects.

The MBAs being graduated from schools like Harvard receive the same thorough leftist indoctrination that other Harvard students do, and it takes root in a certain number of cases. Gramsci's model for socialism is well under way.


21 posted on 09/17/2004 10:41:03 AM PDT by Bogolyubski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2; EdReform; GrandMoM; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; ..
Bump and ping.

Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.1)
Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.0)
Homosexual Keyword Search

24 posted on 09/17/2004 1:53:39 PM PDT by scripter (Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

At least Dobson's not seeing Satanic symbols in P&G's logo. That alone makes me want to take a second look at his claims about them.


28 posted on 09/17/2004 4:29:20 PM PDT by asgardshill (By direct order, I LOVE ALAN KEYES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Dobson: Boycott Procter & Gamble

Though Dobson is within his Constitutional rights to call for a boycott, if he believes he's doing it for Biblical-based Christian reasons, he is sadly mistaken.
30 posted on 09/19/2004 6:34:42 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
"And if you do not endorse and accept homosexuality, they will drum you out of the company."

If this is the basis for the boycott then you need to boycott the Federal Government. This is the predominant philosophy in all government agencies.

33 posted on 09/29/2004 4:02:08 AM PDT by Casloy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson