Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: walford; MadIvan; doug from upland

The joke of it all is that Iraq's trade mission to Niger was not a secret, so I don't know why Bush bothered to credit British intel for information that is essentially public.

In 1999 Iraq sent Ambassador Zahawie to Niger to hold conversations. Zahawie is famous for advocating the development of nuclear weapons by Arab states. Since Niger is not known for many exports aside from uranium, since Iraq has previously bought uranium from Niger, its not difficult to draw conclusions.

Wilson claimed at one point that Baghdad Bob also made a trip to Niger, and Nigerien officials also claimed that they had been contacted by Iraqi businessmen.

Wilson, and Niger, claimed though that neither Niger nor France would ever be involved in illicit sales of uranium.

But of course, since Libya has given up its nuclear program, we now know that they were buying their uranium from Niger, and hence, France.

Why would France be investigating uranium sales they themselves would be involved in? The idea that they would be plugging leaks makes sense. The fake documents were handed over to the US by France, and then exposed as fakes by a French member of the IAEA. This had the effect of discrediting a story that was not only true but public. And it very nearly brought down Bush at a time that he was preparing a war that France very much wished to derail.

It doesn't take a long memory to recall that France had maybe a hundred billion dollars on the line in Iraq's oil industry, and most of the high tech weaponry our guys came up against was French built and of recent vintage, some of it shipped immediately prior to the invasion.

France is not our friend.


35 posted on 09/18/2004 6:47:57 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: marron

Well done.


36 posted on 09/18/2004 7:00:27 PM PDT by doug from upland (Dan Rather is a journalist like Michael Moore is a pole vaulter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: marron

Why isn't Kofi criticizing this complicity/coverup in nuclear proliferation and is instead ragging on Bush for removing Saddam? Oh, yeah...


37 posted on 09/18/2004 7:15:59 PM PDT by walford (http://utopia-unmasked.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson