Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Top US Marginal Income Tax Rates, 1913--2003
truthandpolitics.org ^ | truthandpolitics.org

Posted on 09/24/2004 2:15:53 PM PDT by paltz

Top US Marginal Income Tax Rates, 1913--2003

Introduction

This is a table of the top marginal tax rate faced by married couples for most of the last century in the US.

Note that these are top marginal rates only, not average effective rates. That is,

The table is limited to married couples merely to make the presentation simpler.

Historical rates (married couples, filing jointly)

Table

Tax year Top marginal
tax rate (%)
Top marginal
tax rate (%) on
earned income,
if different<1>

Taxable
income over--
1913 7   500,000
1914 7   500,000
1915 7   500,000
1916 15   2,000,000

1917 67   2,000,000
1918 77   1,000,000
1919 73   1,000,000
1920 73   1,000,000
1921 73   1,000,000

1922 58   200,000
1923 43.5   200,000
1924 46   500,000
1925 25   100,000
1926 25   100,000

1927 25   100,000
1928 25   100,000
1929 24   100,000
1930 25   100,000
1931 25   100,000

1932 63   1,000,000
1933 63   1,000,000
1934 63   1,000,000
1935 63   1,000,000
1936 79   5,000,000

1937 79   5,000,000
1938 79   5,000,000
1939 79   5,000,000
1940 81.1   5,000,000
1941 81   5,000,000

1942 88   200,000
1943 88   200,000
1944 94 <2>   200,000
1945 94 <2>   200,000

1946 86.45 <3>   200,000
1947 86.45 <3>   200,000
1948 82.13 <4>   400,000
1949 82.13 <4>   400,000

1950 84.36   400,000
1951 91 <5>   400,000
1952 92 <6>   400,000
1953 92 <6>   400,000

1954 91 <7>   400,000
1955 91 <7>   400,000
1956 91 <7>   400,000
1957 91 <7>   400,000

1958 91 <7>   400,000
1959 91 <7>   400,000
1960 91 <7>   400,000
1961 91 <7>   400,000

1962 91 <7>   400,000
1963 91 <7>   400,000
1964 77   400,000
1965 70   200,000

1966 70   200,000
1967 70   200,000
1968 75.25   200,000
1969 77   200,000
1970 71.75   200,000

1971 70 60 200,000
1972 70 50 200,000
1973 70 50 200,000
1974 70 50 200,000

1975 70 50 200,000
1976 70 50 200,000
1977 70 50 203,200
1978 70 50 203,200

1979 70 50 215,400
1980 70 50 215,400
1981 69.125 50 215,400
1982 50   85,600

1983 50   109,400
1984 50   162,400
1985 50   169,020
1986 50   175,250
1987 38.5   90,000

1988 28 <8>   29,750 <8>
1989 28 <8>   30,950 <8>
1990 28 <8>   32,450 <8>

1991 31   82,150
1992 31   86,500
1993 39.6   89,150
1994 39.6   250,000
1995 39.6   256,500

1996 39.6   263,750
1997 39.6   271,050
1998 39.6   278,450
1999 39.6   283,150
2000 39.6   288,350

2001 39.1   297,350
2002 38.6   307,050
2003 35   311,950


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: incometax; marginalrates; taxes

1 posted on 09/24/2004 2:15:55 PM PDT by paltz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: paltz

I dont think I would've lived in the U.S. without an amazing tax lawyer during the 60's & 70's. If the government is confiscating more than 50% of your money it's your duty to move or evade taxes. That's insane that marginal rate was at 90% one time.

I've always said we are a few election away from socialism. Wealth Confiscation began under Roosevelt and basically continued until Regan came along.


2 posted on 09/24/2004 2:23:21 PM PDT by NeoCon_21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NeoCon_21

The clinton years really did as number on Reagan's tax cuts.


3 posted on 09/24/2004 2:27:20 PM PDT by paltz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: paltz

Well when people say Eisenhower was a RINO, I guess they sort of have a point, based on this!


4 posted on 09/24/2004 2:49:44 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Right makes right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz

Nice post. Very informative and instructive to see the rates over the sweep of time. It makes me appreciate Reagan's accomplishement even more after seeing what he was up against and how entrenched those high rates had become for such a long time.


5 posted on 09/24/2004 2:50:02 PM PDT by FlyingFish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_1900AD

Ike was President at a time when the GOP were more obessessed about "balanced budgets" than tax cuts. We need both if you ask me. Bill Owens and (Jeb) Bush have done both.


6 posted on 09/24/2004 2:56:34 PM PDT by Clemenza (I LOVE Halliburton, SUVs and Assault Weapons. Any Questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: paltz

Makes a nice graph with the terms of Harding, Coolidge, Hoover and Reagan overlayed. Just about the only time rates went down was during Republican administrations. Wish I knew how to paste a gif file.


7 posted on 09/24/2004 3:18:09 PM PDT by Laserman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz
What does the term "marginal rate" mean?
8 posted on 09/24/2004 3:22:07 PM PDT by Wolfstar (John Kerry may trust the enemies of America, but the American people just can't trust John Kerry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

It means that is the rate on the next dollar you earn in the top rate bracket.


9 posted on 09/24/2004 3:24:43 PM PDT by Laserman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Laserman

Thanks. Like most people, I have those areas where I'm knowledgeable and those where I'm not. Understanding the tax system and its lingo is one where I'm a dunce.


10 posted on 09/24/2004 3:27:12 PM PDT by Wolfstar (John Kerry may trust the enemies of America, but the American people just can't trust John Kerry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

I have the same problem when I try and figure out what the H$%% John Kerry is saying or stands for. A fruitless effort.


11 posted on 09/24/2004 3:30:59 PM PDT by Laserman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: paltz

Great post, thanks.


12 posted on 09/24/2004 3:33:42 PM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laserman
A fruitless effort.

Agreed, but then I don't even try to understand what the Dork-in-Chief flaps his gums about daily. Guess I'll have to pay attention to him during the debates. But my fondest fantasy for the debates is that our Dubya will grab that finger Kerry keeps pointing and shaking at people, and snap it off like a dry twig.

13 posted on 09/24/2004 3:43:25 PM PDT by Wolfstar (John Kerry may trust the enemies of America, but the American people just can't trust John Kerry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

No problem. It stuns me that the gov't was taking over 90%. This is nothing but legal robbery.


14 posted on 09/24/2004 8:43:31 PM PDT by paltz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: paltz
It stuns me that the gov't was taking over 90%.

LOL. That's the point. They only thought they were. Nobody was making that salary. The compensation was made through other means. That's why a 90 percent (or even 50 percent) tax rate is a joke as far as a means of raising revenue.

15 posted on 09/24/2004 8:53:01 PM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: paltz
Here's another way to look at it:

Woodrow Wilson : 1913-1921
Warren G. Harding : 1921-1923
Calvin Coolidge : 1923-1929
Herbert C. Hoover : 1929-1933
Franklin D. Roosevelt : 1933-1945
Harry S. Truman : 1945-1953
Dwight D. Eisenhower: 1953-1961
John F. Kennedy : 1961-1963
Lyndon B. Johnson : 1963-1969
Richard M. Nixon : 1969-1974
Gerald Ford : 1974-1977
Jimmy Carter : 1977-1981
Ronald Reagan : 1981-1989
George Bush : 1989-1993
Bill Clinton : 1993-2001
George W. Bush : 2001-

Top US Marginal Income Tax Rates, 1913--2003

Introduction

This is a table of the top marginal tax rate faced by married couples for most of the last century in the US.

Note that these are top marginal rates only, not average effective rates. That is,

The table is limited to married couples merely to make the presentation simpler.

Historical rates (married couples, filing jointly)

Table

Tax year Top marginal
tax rate (%)
Top marginal
tax rate (%) on
earned income,
if different<1>
Taxable
income over--
1913 7   500,000
1914 7   500,000
1915 7   500,000
1916 15   2,000,000
1917 67   2,000,000
1918 77   1,000,000
1919 73   1,000,000
1920 73   1,000,000
1921 73   1,000,000
1922 58   200,000
1923 43.5   200,000
1924 46   500,000
1925 25   100,000
1926 25   100,000
1927 25   100,000
1928 25   100,000
1929 24   100,000
1930 25   100,000
1931 25   100,000
1932 63   1,000,000
1933 63   1,000,000
1934 63   1,000,000
1935 63   1,000,000
1936 79   5,000,000
1937 79   5,000,000
1938 79   5,000,000
1939 79   5,000,000
1940 81.1   5,000,000
1941 81   5,000,000
1942 88   200,000
1943 88   200,000
1944 94 <2>   200,000
1945 94 <2>   200,000
1946 86.45 <3>   200,000
1947 86.45 <3>   200,000
1948 82.13 <4>   400,000
1949 82.13 <4>   400,000
1950 84.36   400,000
1951 91 <5>   400,000
1952 92 <6>   400,000
1953 92 <6>   400,000
1954 91 <7>   400,000
1955 91 <7>   400,000
1956 91 <7>   400,000
1957 91 <7>   400,000
1958 91 <7>   400,000
1959 91 <7>   400,000
1960 91 <7>   400,000
1961 91 <7>   400,000
1962 91 <7>   400,000
1963 91 <7>   400,000
1964 77   400,000
1965 70   200,000
1966 70   200,000
1967 70   200,000
1968 75.25   200,000
1969 77   200,000
1970 71.75   200,000
1971 70 60 200,000
1972 70 50 200,000
1973 70 50 200,000
1974 70 50 200,000
1975 70 50 200,000
1976 70 50 200,000
1977 70 50 203,200
1978 70 50 203,200
1979 70 50 215,400
1980 70 50 215,400
1981 69.125 50 215,400
1982 50   85,600
1983 50   109,400
1984 50   162,400
1985 50   169,020
1986 50   175,250
1987 38.5   90,000
1988 28 <8>   29,750 <8>
1989 28 <8>   30,950 <8>
1990 28 <8>   32,450 <8>
1991 31   82,150
1992 31   86,500
1993 39.6   89,150
1994 39.6   250,000
1995 39.6   256,500
1996 39.6   263,750
1997 39.6   271,050
1998 39.6   278,450
1999 39.6   283,150
2000 39.6   288,350
2001 39.1   297,350
2002 38.6   307,050
2003 35   311,950

Graph

This graph is a plot of year (first column in the table) against the corresponding top marginal rate (second column in the table) (in blue). Where the top marginal rate on earned income differs (1971--1981), it is also plotted (in red).


Comments

For a more detailed discussion, see the references below. Note that


16 posted on 09/25/2004 5:42:09 AM PDT by paltz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson