Posted on 09/25/2004 10:05:52 PM PDT by NewMediaFan
On the one hand we have a major television network racing to broadcast news about 30-year-old ``documents'' - now proven to be fraudulent - all in an effort to discredit President Bush [related, bio]. On the other hand we virtually have all of the networks ignoring a real, fresh-as-today, scandal involving the Kerry campaign's fund-raising.
The Associated Press reported this past week that a South Korean national who met with John Kerry's fund-raisers and discussed setting up a new political group for Korean-Americans was actually an intelligence agent for South Korea.
Chung Byung-Man, a counselor official in Los Angeles prior to being shipped back home in May, was, in fact, a member of South Korea's National Intelligence Service, the equivalent of our CIA.
Chung's campaign fund-raising activities would be in violation of the 1963 Vienna Convention that prohibits foreign officials from interfering in the internal politics of the host nation.
The Kerry campaign insists it knew nothing about Chung's real position until informed by the Associated Press. But the AP reported it was alerted to meetings between Chung and the Kerry campaign and to Chung's real identity by Democratic donors and fund-raisers who were uncomfortable with Chung's activities. Chung was registered with the Justice Department as a foreign intelligence agent on U.S. soil...
(Excerpt) Read more at news.bostonherald.com ...
IIRC, the current SK government believes that buying off NK is the best method of maintaining peace.
Which candidate is more likely to agree to return to the Clinton years of bribing NK to keep the peace?
Need to learn more before adding to the John F. Kerry Timeline.
.
True, Kerry would return to bribing NK.
Which candidate is more likely to do absolutely nothing, while the NWO siphons billions in graft to its coffers, and while the foes of the USA grow stronger?
Uh...isn't the answer the same to your question as mine?
My answer wasn't meant to counter yours. Of course, the answer would be any cowardly Democrat. Kerry is the current nom de postal.
Ah, ok, I read your question as a counter, not an addendum.
As great as the internet is, communication over it still has some drawbacks in clarity. ;)
Well I am convinced Mc Carthy was right, he didn't go after the dems party though, just hollywood.
Ping.
This particular intelligence agent has ties to a previous South Korean president who is described in one article as "disgraced."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.