South Carolina Ping List
Click Here if you want to be added to or removed from this list.
Posted on 09/26/2004 3:00:03 PM PDT by Willie Green
For education and discussion only. Not for commercial use.
COLUMBIA, S.C. -- The drain of jobs to cheaper markets overseas and the Republican candidate's eagerness to usher in free trade agreements has prompted textile leaders to support a Democrat in South Carolina's U.S. Senate race this year.
"There's a lot of Republicans up here who would struggle to vote for a Democrat, but in the textile industry there's a number of us who are finding it much easier this election," said Carl Lehner, chief executive officer of Leigh Fibers in Spartanburg.
Industry leaders embraced Democrat Inez Tenenbaum after U.S. Rep. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., defeated their favored candidate, former Gov. David Beasley, in the GOP primary. The winner will replace retiring Sen. Ernest "Fritz" Hollings, D-S.C.
Many textile executives vowed to support DeMint's opponent - Republican or Democrat - after the congressman voted two years ago to give the president added power to negotiate trade agreements.
"Inez is far more supportive of our industry than Jim DeMint is," Lehner said. "He has consistently voted with President Bush on free trade issues, which generally work against the interest of the textile industry."
In the Carolinas, textile mills used to be the backbone of many communities' economies. As those factories are shuttered, many people in often rural areas are left without jobs - and sometimes without options.
The fate of the textile industry has been less of an issue in the North Carolina Senate race between Democrat Erskine Bowles and Republican Richard Burr, but it's still important.
Bowles, a Charlotte, N.C., investment banker and President Clinton's former chief of staff, has received more than $100,000 from the textile industry. His wife, Crandall, leads Springs Industries, a bedding and drapery manufacturer near the state line in Rock Hill, S.C.
Democrats Tenenbaum and Bowles each oppose the Central American Free Trade Agreement, while DeMint supports it. Burr, the North Carolina U.S. Rep., has said the agreement "doesn't cut it."
The agreement must be ratified by Congress, which means whoever wins the November elections likely will get to vote on the deal.
Tenenbaum, the state's education superintendent, promises it's not too late to save the battered industry and blames DeMint's votes during his three terms in Congress for the loss of thousands of South Carolina textile jobs.
DeMint is unapologetic about his support of free trade, saying it's the only way to create jobs that keep the state competitive in the global marketplace.
"What we're doing now is not free trade at all," said Jock Nash, a Washington lobbyist and lawyer for textile magnate Roger Milliken of Spartanburg. "When a corporation leaves America and goes to China to make their stuff and sells it back here, that's not trade. You're seeing the deconstruction of our manufacturing base."
Milliken poured money into Beasley's campaign, but has so far been silent in the DeMint-Tenenbaum race.
Robert Edsall, who owns a Spartanburg-based textile marketing company, said industry leaders raised about $35,000 for Tenenbaum at a $500-a-plate luncheon last month.
The American Manufacturing Trade Action Coalition has put up billboards across South Carolina and pushed to get every textile, apparel and fiber employee registered to vote.
Lehner hopes to convince his employees and their peers across the Republican-leaning state that it's OK to vote for a Democrat.
He has set up Internet access for his 200 employees to register to vote online or pick up a registration form.
"I've also given talks to our employees indicating to them that trade policies make a difference, who determines trade policies make a difference and that some candidates have been more supportive of our industry than others," Lehner said.
University of Virginia political scientist Larry Sabato questions how effective the textile vote, formerly a solid GOP voting bloc, will be this year.
"They have moved to Democrats almost out of desperation, things are so bad," he said. "It's important, but it's not as important as it once was because this is a shrunken force."
Lehner, who has contributed thousands of dollars to Republicans in the past, said it's the first time in 20 years with the company that he's gotten involved in politics with his employees.
"With quotas coming off in January, it's pretty important that people pay attention to this election," said Lehner, who has 100 fewer employees than a decade ago. Global quotas on textiles are set to expire on Jan. 1, and U.S. companies are bracing for a flood of cheaply made Chinese apparel.
Tenenbaum has accused DeMint of being a Washington insider who's failed to enforce trade policies, especially with China. She also has called for a moratorium on new trade policies until their long-term effects can be studied.
South Carolina's economy has perked up recently, but the textile industry will never return to what it once was.
"Unless the Democratic candidates really believe that they are going to roll back existing free trade commitments, that's not going to change," said Roland Stephen, associate professor of political economy at North Carolina State University.
He said candidates should talk about giving tools to businesses and to workers to adjust to the global market.
Textile leaders say they welcome trade on a fair playing field. They have lobbied lawmakers to close all import loopholes, keep tariffs and duties at their current levels, use only U.S. companies for defense and security contracts and strictly enforce safeguards against growing imports from China.
DeMint has tried to tame the trade issue, regularly pointing out that jobs in the state were lost to the recession and increased business efficiency. He says free trade helped South Carolina's exports grow by 22 percent in 2003.
He points to the BMW plant near Greer, S.C., as the positive side of global trade. About 4,700 employees turn out luxury automobiles, more than half of which are exported for sale.
DeMint says he just wants America to be competitive.
"We do that by opening markets and enforcing the trade agreements that we have and providing new opportunities for our exporters here," said his campaign spokeswoman, Kara Borie.
Economists and experts say free trade is good for the country as a whole but may have negative effects.
"It's in our best interest to have developing countries develop," Stephen said. However, "it is true that this transition is a painful one."
ping
Maybe because Bowles worked for Clinton, who supported NAFTA, etc.
I don't think Inez has a prayer.
It is long past time for the US testile industry to be entirely outsourced. It is a drain on the Treasury and keeps clothing costs artificially high. It is a labor intensive and capital wasting industry that cannot support itself. It cannot survive without quotas and tariffs and subsidies. That capital would be used much more efficiently and would creat many more remunarative jobs if the textile industry were not draining it off into a sinkhole of inefficiency.
The textile industry is on its last leg in this country. The US is no longer a LOW-TECH manuafacturing force. It has no way to compete with dirt-cheap labor.
The US's future lies with HIGH-TECH manufacturing and DESIGN/CREATION --- we are far better at it than most foreign labor/financial powers...when they become slightly adept at it, their costs skyrocket...follow the trail ---
first JAPAN, then KOREA, then, then, .... and I predict that China will eventually have the same problem -- which will have a tendency of leveling the playing field.
The Bush Administration is outsourcing THAT as well.
Haven't you heard?
We're supposed to be a nation of 'burger flippers, buried in debt that won't be repaid in a dozen generations.
given both Bush and Demint are up in SC by over 10 points, this is a pretty pointless article. I guess they want to fritter away what little influence they still might have
sorry the Bush administration isnt outsouring anything.
Are you suggesting when HP moves jobs overseas it is Bush who is doing it.
Before you go on about trade polcies, those jobs would be moving oversears regardless of taxes or subsidies to keep them here. The wage gap is greater than the productivity gap
Sad to see everyone so desperate. Sadder still is the thinking that a vote for the Democrats will change anything. Until the American workers wise up and unite behind third party, the jobs will continue to disappear and the "cheap labor" problem at the border will continue to devastate our pocketbooks. I'll be voting for the Constitution Party because of this issue.
Sad to see everyone so desperate. Sadder still is the thinking that a vote for the Democrats will change anything. Until the American workers wise up and unite behind third party, the jobs will continue to disappear and the "cheap labor" problem at the border will continue to devastate our pocketbooks. I'll be voting for the Constitution Party because of this issue.
The Bush Administration is outsourcing THAT as well.
Haven't you heard?
Some people don't want to hear.
No I'm suggesting that the Administration's trade and economic policies undermine our domestic industries for the benefit of transnational corporations.
Before you go on about trade polcies, those jobs would be moving oversears regardless of taxes or subsidies to keep them here. The wage gap is greater than the productivity gap
A shift in tax policy would overcome the wage differential. Elimination of the corporate income tax and enactment of a relatively low (10~15%) flat-rate revenue tariff on ALL imported goods would dramaticly increase business investment within our own economy. Other policy enactments, such as tort reform, would also make our domestic economy more competitive and conducive to business investment. Unfortunately, the Bush Administration does not represent these domestic business interests.
This is starting to look like some kind of RAT propaganda media blitz. I mean, up until today, Kerry's abysmal failings have been reflected in every single poll and venue he's been in, and now all of a sudden, all these headlines are reading that DemocRATs are ahead in this poll and that poll and more democRATs are registering to vote and non-traditional groups supporting democRATs.....can you say there's some seriously organized lying going on?
Dubya organized his own backlash opposition when he backstabbed domestic industries and handed the trade issue to the 'Rats on a silver platter.
They had no problem outsourcing their entire industry out of Lowell and Fall River to the south 100 years ago.
Click Here if you want to be added to or removed from this list.
I agrre with all your perscriptions except the tariffs.
I wouldnt oppose tariffs on final good but tariffs on inputs like steel and sugar actually cost more jobs than they save
With the unemployment rate low at 5.4 percent there is no reason why displaced textile workers can't get employment elsewhere. What would Kerry do for you? Keep the jobs here and rather than paying ten dollars for a shirt, we pay fifty?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.