Thq questions don't matter; only the answers.
I think Bush has lured Kerry into the briar patch.
Kerry was forced to be a bigger hawk than Bush, and he gains nothing by that.
No Bush voter is going to be converted by Kerry's blustering, but lots of Michael Moore voters are going to start thinking about Kerry's two extra divisions, and his doubling of the Special Forces, and his promise to go everywhere and fix all the problems of the world. Some will ask themselves which social programs will be cut to pay for all of this.
Some folks will wonder why it is best to go it alone in North Korea, but everywhere else requites a coalition.
Eventually someone will ask how the U.N. can be trusted after stealing kid's milk money.
Eventually someone will ask how the French and Russians can be motivated, since Kerry himself said they were too entangled in self interest.
Kerry fancies himself as a great military tactician, better than the generals on the ground. He could fight Tora Bora and Falujia better than the guys wo did it. This will be fun to watch. The last American presidents who diddled in tactics were LBJ and Carter.
The minions of the democratic faithful accept 'using' mendacity as a tool for the price of winning.
I have heard many Kerry and Clintonites dismiss debating point like this as 'necessary fibs'. That Kerry has lied and his supporters know that Kerry has no intention of following up on this point in reality, so the extra cost does not exists. The minions of the democratic faithful accept mendacity as the price of winning.
Viable national freedom hangs from a gossamer web of truth, morality and trust.