[Diddley]

That Killian would have written (or had someone type) these 6 documents is absurd.
He would have had to have gone to extreme measures for 6 document only.
He would have had to ignore certain styles.
He would have had to insert false information.
He would have had to have gone counter to accepted practices, and done totally incomprehensible things.

That Rather, et al would expect us to believe them about these certain fakes indicates that they are disturbed.

[Rabble]

Good, Keeping busy on this farce lessens their ability to do damage elsewhere....

[muawiyah]

Still, in the end, it's obvious that the forgeries are forgeries because they exhibit signs of "kerning".

This capability simply did not exist in 1972 on any typewriter.

Did not exist.

It's different than "proportional spacing".

[John Valentine]

It's actually even worse and even more unlikely than you have shown, for even if Killian had been able to do all these things mentioned, there is still a ZERO chance that Killian or ANYONE, back in 1972, typing on a then existing machine, even with great effort and precision could precisely match a document format not to be in existence for another fifteen years - through sheer coincidence and dumb luck.

The chance of that happening is indistinguishable from the chance that a chimpanzee could sit down in front of a typewriter and compose a limerick - and not just any limerick - this PRECISE limerick:

CBS replaced Cronkite with Rather
With Cronkite's blessing, I gather.
But as Danny grew older
His indiscretions grew bolder
And his words became nothing but blather

i.e. vanishingly small. ZERO. Ergo, the documents are recent computer generated fabrications.

Case closed hard.