Posted on 10/11/2004 3:48:18 PM PDT by mrplind
You are a Godsend... Thank You.
Ping..
Where in the heck were Kerry and Edwards when this came up?
Expressing the sense of the Senate with respect to the actions the President should take before any use of military force against Iraq without the broad support of the international... (Introduced in Senate)
SRES 32 IS
Expressing the sense of the Senate with respect to the actions the President should take before any use of military force against Iraq without the broad support of the international community.
Mr. KENNEDY (for himself and Mr. BYRD) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations
Expressing the sense of the Senate with respect to the actions the President should take before any use of military force against Iraq without the broad support of the international community.
Whereas more than three months have passed, and circumstances have significantly changed, since Congress acted in October 2002 to authorize the use of military force against Iraq ;
Whereas the United Nations Security Council unanimously approved Security Council Resolution 1441 (2002) requiring Iraq to cooperate with strict weapons inspections and give United Nations weapons inspectors `immediate, unimpeded, unconditional, and unrestricted access' to all suspected sites involving such weapons;
Whereas United Nations weapons inspectors arrived in Iraq on November 18, 2002, submitted their 60-day report to the Security Council about Iraq's cooperation with weapons inspections on January 27, 2003, and will report again on their activities on February 14, 2003;
Whereas the President has not yet made a compelling case to Congress, the American people, or the international community that the use of armed force is the only alternative to disarm Iraq ; and
Whereas Congress and the American people are increasingly concerned that the President is prepared to use armed force against Iraq without broad support by the international community, and without making a compelling case that Iraq presents such an imminent threat to the national security of the United States that unilateral action is justified: Now, therefore, be it
| Sen Byrd, Robert C. [WV] - 1/29/2003 |
If they were ohhhhh sooooo concerned that their votes allowing force were being misused, why weren't they co-sponsors of that?
"..the documents may be false, but the spirit of what is contained in the documents is believed to be true" c`mon MSM it worked before.
LOL! Actually one of the radio guys on the morning show commented something to the effect of "Dan Rather ought to release these documents. After all he has the least credibility to lose at this point ..."
Can any freeper get Glenn Reynolds (Instapundit) or Powerline or Hugh Hewitt in contact with CNS/World Tribune folks. This needs to be quickly and throughly vetted then shoved down the MSM's throat so they cannot ignore it.
" All of that information and anything like it will be HIDDEN by the "elitist media". "
hidden like this news report from ABC in 1999?
http://www.warroom.com
The MSM is clearly ignoring all of this, how do we get it out to the American public? By going into chat-rooms around the net from A to Z and dropping the direct links, even if the chats and blogs have nothing to do with news or politics?
ABC news has already instructed their people that this is the ABC approach.
Why is it these tyrant elitists always point their finger at people.
He`d never do it, the shred of chance that they might be true would cause a palsey like effect in his hands. He`d go into seizure or something just trying to read the cue-cards. I`d love to see that though!
How does this work that they have these documents and our own people reached such a different conclusion? I've never believed that every single intelligence agency on the planet was simply wrong about Saddam's WMD.
Thanks for the ping.
Hey Tonk, you've pinged me on a lot of interesting threads, thought you might be interested in this one on the Iraq-AlQaeda connections.
Post 2 has a link to the details.
BTTT
If Walid Phares says they're legit, Laura Ingraham would be a good candidate to do so.
It's about GD time some of this stuff started to hit the airwaves.
Saddam's support for religious terrorists like Islamic Jihad and Hamas requires no fancy "evidence." Saddam openly boasted of his $25,000 per event subsidy to suicide bombers.
Like President Bush always says .. I TRUST THE PEOPLE.
I believe that's us!!
Yes, which is why it always baffles me when the DimWits say he had no ties to terrorists.
I guess those are 'freedom fighters' or some such BS.
YEP! Better late than never, but GWB and the campaign needs to get on this and make it happen ... I want a landslide victory on 11/2
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.