Posted on 10/13/2004 3:18:00 PM PDT by MikefromOhio
Review Of Washington Post And Newsweek Articles Exhausts Efforts Of The Naval IG Office
Navy Secretary Refuses To Conduct Independent Inquiry
(WASHINGTON, D.C.) Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, stated today that it received a response from the Naval Inspector General (IG) to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) open records request for Navy IG records documenting the investigation of the awards and conduct of Lieutenant (jg) John Forbes Kerry, USNR. The request was prompted by a Sept. 17, 2004, letter from Vice Admiral Ronald Route, the Naval IG, to Judicial Watch. Admiral Route declined to investigate the circumstances of Kerrys awards and conduct because it would not have been productive.
The records produced under FOIA reveal that the Naval IGs investigation of the circumstances surrounding Kerrys awards and conduct as a U.S. Navy officer consisted strictly of a review of existing files and archived regulations. While Navy Public Affairs officers originally told the press that there was no investigation being conducted concerning Judicial Watchs request, the Naval IGs records prove the Navy Public Affairs statements were misleading.
The substance of what would have been a legitimate investigation interviews of eyewitnesses, reviews of travel records, transcripts, FBI files and other relevant material were not pursued by Naval IG investigators. Instead, Admiral Route and his investigators exhausted their investigative efforts reviewing a Washington Post article from Aug. 22, 2004, and a Newsweek report from the Aug. 30, 2004, edition. The unnamed investigator(s) also relied on Kerrys presidential campaign Internet site to conduct the investigation.
In separate correspondence dated Oct. 5, 2004, from Secretary of the Navy Gordon R. England (click here), Judicial Watch learned that Secretary England has embraced Admiral Routes investigation and has declined to take any independent investigative or administrative action with respect to Kerrys awards or conduct.
Its clear that both the uniformed and civilian leadership of the U.S. Navy view the Kerry matter as a political hot potato. The leadership of the Navy has failed to ensure its awards process was not corrupted. This is shameful, said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.
Ping!!!
Let me retype this so that it is correct...
Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and files suits over government corruption, which we so far have yet to win a single one...
wonderful job...Some investigation huh
Freedom of information request for the records. Why didn't they get the records?
I think, wisely, the Navy's office of IG has refused to be drawn into a political squabble.
ping
Unfortunately, I'm hearing that the military handed out medals like Cracker Jack prizes during Vietnam. I've heard that many honorable men turned down medals they felt they hadn't earned. Kerry is dishonorable in his plotting to secure phony medals, accepting them, and using them to abandon his supposed band of brothers by cutting and running from 'Nam, but the Navy seems to be clearly complicit in this crime by aiding and abetting it then and today. I'm guessing the other services are just as guilty. To restore our faith in the military, they need to reform their system of medal disbursement immediately.
Hey, Tonk, thanks for the new, top link (checking it out now!) about the discharge, as well as others in the new version.
Admittedly, I would usually just scroll past your super-post, as I'd already seen so many of your links. Glad to see the update!
It can sometimes be annoying on some threads, but it IS good & important work.
They've dishonored their uniform and are unfaithful to the oath they took upon their commission.
SFS (former CDR, SC, USNR)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.