Posted on 10/18/2004 6:17:00 AM PDT by Theodore R.
Profiting from rape
Posted: October 18, 2004 1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2004 WorldNetDaily.com
Hollywood is about to release its tribute to the man who launched the "sexual revolution."
The film is called "Kinsey," a name mostly associated with shattering our archaic ideas about sex and popularizing the notion that values were really just old-fashioned "hang-ups."
The truth is that Alfred Kinsey was not a legitimate researcher. He was not some kind of pioneer and scholar in the area of human sexuality. He was not a heroic figure who transformed society for the better.
He was a monster.
He protected pedophiles
He was a pervert.
He was a beast akin to Dr. Josef Mengele – and that's the way he should be remembered.
For years, the foremost scholar in the area of Kinsey, Dr. Judith Reisman, has been trying to blow the whistle on the author of 1948's explosive book, "Sexual Behavior in the Human Male."
She shows that the book was actually a record of unspeakable sexual human experiments conducted by sexual predators on hundreds, perhaps thousands, of children.
The study was used by Kinsey to support the idea that sexual activity in children – even with adults – is natural and healthy and should not be repressed.
Reisman, along with Dr. Laura Schlessinger, has attempted to alert the public, as well as the movie's producers and actor Liam Neeson, to the hard truth about Kinsey, the subject of this sympathetic portrayal on the big screen.
Not only is the movie about to whitewash Kinsey's record, it's also getting a facelift from the rest of the media, backed by multimillion-dollar grants from the Ford Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation and Indiana University's Kinsey Institute.
Kinsey used data from the diaries of pedophiles like Rex King and Nazi Fritz von Balluseck, who was tried for the rape and murder of a 10-year-old girl. King's data appears in a table in "Sexual Behavior in the Human Male" that summarized his attempts to bring to orgasm boys between the ages of 2 months and 15 years, in some cases over a period of 24 hours.
Kinsey falsely claimed the information came from multiple sources. But even retired Kinsey Institute director John Bancroft admitted in 1995 that it all came from King.
Though Reisman has twice been denied screenings of the film due out next month, reports about it suggest it is the story of a "tragic hero" who overcame the religious rigidity of his Methodist father to pave the way for sexual freedom.
Reisman acknowledges that our society has become sufficiently jaded that most will watch the movie and accept it at face value. What audiences will not be told, however, is that Kinsey passed off the rape and sexual victimization of children as science.
The filmmakers continue in the cover-up of this crime against humanity. They continue in to collaborate with evil. They do it knowing the truth. They do it without excuse. They do it to entertain. They do it intentionally to revise history. And they do it for profit.
That's disgusting. But what should we expect from fans of the master of disgust, Alfred Kinsey?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Purchase your copy of Dr. Judith Reisman's "Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
They do it for another reason. There is a coordinated effort to "normalize" child sex.
You would think that it would be a far more interesting and provocative film if the whole truth were told.
I do have a very minor connection to the Kinsey Institute (well after Kinsey passed away). A past director of the institute approached me to assess the accuracy of data concerning certain physiological differences between men and women. It was junk science based on some speculative ideas that she had and I told her that she couldn't use it to support her hypothesis. She didn't take my advice and later included it in a lecture series and perhaps some papers.
Sounds like he is right up there with Margret Sanger.
Kinsey is a tragic fraud who is worshipped by a Babylonian god by the Left and by the MSM, as well as by the deluded popular culture at large.
Kinsey is a tragic fraud who is worshipped like a Babylonian god by the Left and by the MSM, as well as by the deluded popular culture at large.
Too much coffee too quick.
Personally, why go there. We know what Kinsy was; why travel in a book; in his footsteps.
Why go there? Most people think that what Kinsey did was a good thing. (Because they haven't heard the truth) It made us less uptight. Most people think that he was a good guy. We have to go there. We have to get the message out. We are paying a terrible price for not going there. And that price will only increase if we hide our heads in the sand.
Well agree they need to get the message out as to what Kinsy was; but that message has been out there, for years; and I think other books have been written explaining Kinsey.
What I find disconcerting is how graphic does one have to be to communicate that he was a criminal sicko.
Kinsey protected himself under the guise of 'legitimate research'. . .just have to be careful when you investigate the line he crossed; and wonder, if for the 'intensely curious'; if this does not 'spawn' more Kinsey's; or more excuses for criminal behavior.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.