[LZ_Bayonet]

Kerry's historical record, in his own words, in 1970, 1994 and 2004 (global test), viewed in sequence show that he has a long time agenda to turn the security of the United States over to the UN. http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/004/804suggy.asp/

[TomGuy]

Rush just played an audio interview of Kerry's in 1994. In it, Kerry basically said the same thing---that American soldiers who die under a UN command die honorably, but those who die under an American command don't.


Kerry is still the internationalist. Otherwise, he wouldn't be advocating the 'global test'.

[joesnuffy]

Its a New World Odor emanating from JF Kerry's camp pain

[DrDavid]

Sting would rather vote for a "chimpanzee than Bush":

Cool, get the UN to deploy our troops all over the world and then any 3-bit country could invade the US with no resistance.

[backhoe]

John Kerry- some selected, informative links...Click the picture & goto "last" for the latest:

[OldFriend]

We see how well the UN did in Uganda when Idi Amin was killing many many thousands of his citizens, move on to the starving for political reasons in Africa. Move on to starvation by the war lords in Somalia, then we see Rwanda, Sudan, and there is no need to continue.

The UN needs to leave our country. IMMEDIATELY

[truth_seeker]

Could Kerry's UN direct the US to give up territory, or wealth and resources, for his "internationalist" ends?

Say that Indonesia wanted to spread islam to Hawaii. Would Neville Kerry assist the UN to avoid war, keep peaceful relations, by requiring turnover of Hawaii to Indonesia?

Maybe Mexico wants lands which were briefly theirs. California, Arizona, New Mexico, etc. Would Neville Kerry negotiate with the UN?

[RightWhale]

Those were the days. Before the rise of understanding of the state. The UN is not a state, and Kerry among others thought they could create a state.

You cannot create a state.
--Jim Morrison