Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge scraps TV law: Ruling could open door to a world of new channels(Good news for Canadians)
National Post ^ | October 29, 2004 | Mike King

Posted on 10/29/2004 9:56:35 AM PDT by youngtory

MONTREAL -- Making it illegal for Canadians to subscribe to foreign television channels via satellite infringes on their freedom of expression, a long-awaited judgment concluded Thursday.

The 153-page ruling by Quebec Court Judge Danielle Cote found two sections of the federal Radiocommunication Act dealing with so-called grey-market satellite systems for decoding an encrypted programming signal violate the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

"She had to invalidate the law because the law itself was so infringing," said Jacques D'Argy of Drummondville, Que., who sought the court ruling.

D'Argy and his brother-in-law, Richard Theriault, were charged in December 1998 with using the DirecTV satellite system to access U.S. signals.

Cote acquitted them in September 2000 and, in June 2001, Superior Court Justice Jean-Guy Boilard rejected a Crown appeal. But in May 2002, the Quebec Court of Appeal overturned the acquittals and sent the case back to Cote.

That same year, the Supreme Court of Canada declared that anyone selling technology allowing consumers to access encrypted signals from U.S.-based satellite systems is committing a federal offence.

D'Argy, representing himself throughout all the court proceedings, said Thursday he always wondered "Why can I import the New York Times, but not (U.S. television network) Fox?"

He also noted that, at one time, "I could have spent a year in jail for watching the American Congress on C-SPAN. Does that make sense?"

"Isn't that terrific?" exclaimed Alan Gold, a Toronto lawyer who represents several grey-market satellite dealers in Ontario. "I'm delighted, we've been waiting for this decision."

Calling it "very, very important and wonderful news," Gold said it means the federal government will no longer be able to control what Canadians watch on TV.

"This will give people the freedom to pay money and subscribe to the stations they want," he added. "It is the beginning of the end for the systems we now have."

The Coalition Against Satellite Signal Theft -- which is made up of Canadian broadcasting, cable and satellite associations -- is studying Cote's lengthy decision.

"The only thing we know is that it's in favour of the plaintiffs," CASST official Harris Boyd, senior vice-president (industry affairs) at the Canadian Cable Television Association, said from Ottawa.

Francine Robichaud of the federal Justice Department said "lots of questions are raised in that judgment." As a result, the department "will take the time to analyse it in detail before deciding whether or not to appeal."

Cote gave a delay of one year to put her ruling into effect.

(MONTREAL GAZETTE)


TOPICS: Canada; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: canada; canadians; canuckistan; crtc; quebec; satellite; tv
This is good news for all you Canadians who own US Satellite Dishes.
1 posted on 10/29/2004 9:56:36 AM PDT by youngtory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: youngtory

Fox heading north...Canada may yet be saved!


2 posted on 10/29/2004 9:57:52 AM PDT by 2banana (They want to die for Islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: youngtory

Cool. Now they can get gay-MTV (Logos).

Oh, I forgot, they already have an all-gay cable channel in Canada.


3 posted on 10/29/2004 9:57:59 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever ("...upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: youngtory

FNC might get into Canada yet!


4 posted on 10/29/2004 9:58:23 AM PDT by rightazrain ("John, go to your room!," the Portuguese Martha Mitchell screeched.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: youngtory

You mean that Canadians could go to jail for watching the NFL (On Directv) and not the CFL on CBC? What a country!!


5 posted on 10/29/2004 10:01:12 AM PDT by mc5cents (Always trust your fellow man, and always cut the cards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: youngtory
Thank God for a breath of freedom in the corrupt Canadian system.

The level of civil liberties is much lower in Canada, where the inhabitants are fed complete Liberal Party and other socialist propaganda on all media outlets, disguised as news.

6 posted on 10/29/2004 10:01:55 AM PDT by FormerACLUmember (Free Republic is 21st Century Samizdat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: youngtory
A friend of mine in Alberta recently got himself a satellite radio subscription for the truck he uses in the oil fields up north. XM and Sirius are not allowed to sell their services there, but lots of Canadians can get satellite radio if they use a U.S. address.

"Whose address did you use?" I asked him.

"I was gonna use yours," he said, "but I didn't have it with me when I was filling out the paperwork -- so I just opened up my owner's manual and gave them the U.S. mailing address for General Motors."

7 posted on 10/29/2004 10:06:11 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (I made enough money to buy Miami -- but I pissed it away on the Alternative Minimum Tax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

> Fox heading north...Canada may yet be saved!

I expect the socialists to decide that Canada now needs
both a jamming and an anti-satellite program.


8 posted on 10/29/2004 10:08:17 AM PDT by Boundless (Was your voter registration sabotaged by ACORN? Don't find out Nov. 2. Vote early.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: youngtory
"Why can I import the New York Times, but not (U.S. television network) Fox?"

Because Ottawa has an agenda. and Fox News doesn't support it.
Silly Canuck.
Don't you know the State knows best?

9 posted on 10/29/2004 10:10:29 AM PDT by akorahil (MSM is RIP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Allan

Ping.


10 posted on 10/29/2004 10:19:33 AM PDT by Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snowyman; Mitchell
I don't understand this ruling.
This story can't possibly be true.
Mr. Snowyman keeps telling us it is for economic reasons
we can't get FOX (or C-Span, or satellite radio) in Canada.
11 posted on 10/29/2004 11:03:38 AM PDT by Allan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: youngtory

Fantastic news - perhaps Canadians will become less liberal now, with Spike and other fine channels ... : )


12 posted on 10/29/2004 11:13:22 AM PDT by valkyrieanne (card-carrying South Park Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson