[fred3]

Would you care to post some of that scientific evidence that you cited? YOu can take an air ballon to the atmosphere and measure the amount of freons(not naturally occuring) and see that it is very high. Anyone with a simple knowledge in chemistry knows that freons react with O3(ozone) and break it down into 02. Also known as global warming. That isn't even mentioning the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere.

[southernerwithanattitude]

Shouldn't you be in a corner somewhere rubbing your crystal?

[RW_Whacko]

"Anyone with a simple knowledge in chemistry knows that freons react with O3(ozone) and break it down into 02. Also known as global warming."

Then I'd recommend *YOU* start doing the responsible thing and start drinking flat beer and soda pop. Quit polluting the air with all that "toxic" CO2 from your pop-tops. /end sarcasm

[SueAngel]

Sure... start here and follow all the links.
http://www.transtronics.com/reference/globalwarming.htm

[GodBlessUSA]

http://www.junkscience.com/

read and learn

[facedown]

Anyone with a simple knowledge in chemistry knows that freons react with O3(ozone) and break it down into 02. Also known as global warming.

Uh, no, that's "destruction of the ozone layer".

You need to keep your junk science hoaxs straight.

[kwhender]

"Anyone with a simple knowledge in chemistry knows that freons react with O3(ozone) and break it down into 02. Also known as global warming.. That isn't even mentioning the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere."
I think "simple" here, is the operative word.
The damage that freons can do to the upper atmosphere has nothing to do with global warming. Depletion of ozone is another issue. Furthermore, use of freons is severely restricted (at least in the US). For at least a decade or more, satellite measurements of global temperature show little or no delta T. This sampling of temperatures is far more reliable than ground-based measurements which don't take into account the increased "heat-islands" of more urbanization and the fact that the Soviet Union's measurement of ground-based temperatures in Arctic climbs has been absent for over 5 years as a consequence of low funding (i.e., no colder ground temps to average out higher ones). The recent increase in global temperature occurred during the 1920's -- a period of time when atmospheric concentration of C02 was half of what it is today. In other words, the popular atmospheric model which says global warming is occurring at an alarming rate doesn't comport with reality. I don't need to be a scientist to evaluate this.