Skip to comments.
Eroding evolution's believability
World Net Daily ^
| November 6, 2004
| Kelly Hollowell, J.D., Ph.D.
Posted on 11/05/2004 10:40:24 PM PST by The Loan Arranger
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
To: King Prout
little early after The Big Game for a Crevo thread, isn't it? LOL - and since when do we have to excerpt WorldNetDaily?
21
posted on
11/06/2004 5:15:25 AM PST
by
Tax-chick
(First we had all the money, then we got all the votes, now we have all the fun!)
To: King Prout
little early after The Big Game for a Crevo thread, isn't it? "....we now return you to your reegularly scheduled food fight, already in progresss...."
22
posted on
11/06/2004 5:29:47 AM PST
by
general_re
(Drive offensively - the life you save may be your own.)
To: PatrickHenry
It also suggests a lengthy coexistence of two different species of man based on geologic evidence that a massive volcano caused the extinction of Homo flores as recently as 12,000 years ago. None of these possibilities are consistent with traditional evolutionary theory.Right, and Madagascar only supports one species of lemur.
23
posted on
11/06/2004 6:45:55 AM PST
by
Fatalis
(John Kyl in 2008)
To: PatrickHenry
A new species?
24
posted on
11/06/2004 7:54:33 AM PST
by
balrog666
(Lack of money is the root of all evil.)
To: PatrickHenry
To: blam
More on that dwarf from the island.
26
posted on
11/06/2004 9:03:53 AM PST
by
farmfriend
( In Essentials, Unity...In Non-Essentials, Liberty...In All Things, Charity.)
To: The Loan Arranger
I'm sorry but I don't see the discovery of new fossils of one species or a hundred to be a challenge to evolution as a theory. Nothing in evolution theory suggests one single thread of species. The driver suggested for evolution, namely natural selection, is based upon many threads being culled over time to drive advantages to survival and reproduction.
In short, the discovery of new fossil evidence might serve to bolster the theory, IMHO
To: balrog666
You wrote:
A new species?
I say, rather:
(Keeping in mind the sagittal crest, you know!)
28
posted on
11/06/2004 5:28:41 PM PST
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: RightWingAtheist
She has my attention.
29
posted on
11/08/2004 9:48:38 AM PST
by
<1/1,000,000th%
(Bush wins!!! Hoo hoo hoo hoo hoo...!!!)
30
posted on
03/06/2008 9:13:19 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/______________________Profile updated Saturday, March 1, 2008)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson