Actually, I was wishing for such a thing myself on election day. We are living in a sea of dims here in VA 8th district and I just would have felt better if I had a receipt...
Posted on 11/12/2004 4:03:02 PM PST by Libloather
Survey: People want receipt showing how they voted
LAS VEGAS SUN
November 12, 2004 at 9:43:50 PST
An Election Day poll in Las Vegas indicated that 81 percent of voters surveyed want to take home a private "ATM style" receipt to verify for themselves their vote was counted correctly, a consulting group said Wednesday.
Lombardo Consulting Group said it surveyed 362 voters in conjunction with political science professor Michael John Burton of Ohio University.
Given a choice between leaving a voter-verified paper ballot at the polling place or taking home a receipt, 60 percent of those asked said they preferred take-home receipts and self-verification, and 36 percent said they preferred the idea of leaving a paper ballot with election officials.
Nevada Secretary of State Dean Heller, the man responsible for overseeing elections throughout the state, opposes giving voters a printed receipt, however. He said that while it may sound like a good idea, it could lead to many problems.
An employer could require a worker to show his receipt to prove he voted a certain way, or the worker could be subject to loss of his job if he didn't follow the wishes of the employer, Heller said. Unions could require a member to verify he voted a certain way in order to keep his membership, said Heller.
Any of those actions would be illegal, however. Heller also said the printed receipts could lead to electioneering problems. He referred to a ruling from his office that a casino could not give free meals to customers who showed records that they had cast their ballots. None of the problems he cited would be caused by voters themselves, however.
Nevada was the only state to use "statewide" voter-verified paper ballot printers attached to electronic voting machines on Election Day.
In a press release, Burton said that "many voters thought a private receipt that they could take home would be the best way to know if their vote was counted correctly. People are used to getting receipts from ATMs or gas stations -- and they liked the idea of getting a receipt from the voting booth."
During the election in Nevada, voters were instructed by poll workers to compare their vote selections on the electronic screen with what was printed on the voter verified paper ballot scroll. The paper ballot scrolls were retained by election officials for use in post-election audits or recounts.
The survey also examined voter interaction with Nevada's voter-verified paper ballot machines and found that only 31 percent of the voters actually compared the entire paper ballot to the machine ballot in order to ensure their vote was recorded accurately.
Lombardo Consulting Group is a corporate and political public opinion research firm with offices in Washington, D.C., and New York City.
Complete survey results can be found at http://www.lombardo consulting group.com /docs/ nvvotersurvey.pdf
Actually, I was wishing for such a thing myself on election day. We are living in a sea of dims here in VA 8th district and I just would have felt better if I had a receipt...
Stapled to their forehead?
There are very good reasons why voters are forbidden from being able to prove how they voted. It is therefore necessary that procedures be in place to allow voters to see that the act of voting tangibly and permanently alters some substitution-resistant medium.
A receipt would lead to disastrous consequences. I'm happy to tell anyone how I voted, but this would lead to widespread demands of proof of how I voted. It's a horrible idea.
They were polled. I bet you if it wasn't a polling situation, it would be the dungocraps that asked.
I agree. Why not give a receipt?
Thus, one laminated card w holes sealed in and bar-code of the same votes sealed in; and one voter with a "receipt" having a bar-code of the results.
Bar-code to also include unique serial no. of the card.
One nice fellow said it would cost money.
Yes, it would; but it would cost less than having several of the alternatives that are more suspect and susceptible to never-ending "litigation."
I like the idea of being able to check that my vote was counted correctly. It sure makes it a lot harder for the democrats to commit fraud.
Let's tattoo it on their forehead.
Because the lawyers would lose a bunch of business.
I LOVE this idea.
After two elections followed by stories of democrats "correcting ballots" in Detroit, it's a very attractive idea.
A lousy idea. It would spell the end of the secret ballot. In precincts controlled by a political machine it would facilitate buying of votes and ensure a permanent lock on the elections.
Perhaps the "secret ballot" concept is held in too high a regard.
I was reading something the other day along these lines (forget the author.... perhaps it was Boston T. Party).
The author's point was that accountability was more important than secrecy, and therefore individual voters should be held accountable for their mistakes, instead of under the current system where everyone is held accountable.
Such a system, in his opinion, would make voters take things more seriously, and they would study the issues more, since if they screwed up, there would be some accountability.
I haven't spent too much time thinking about, but it does seem appealing in some regards.
See #15. Is that really such a bad thing?
I mean #16
Sounds reasonable.
As opposed to what we have now?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.