Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fallujah and D-Day

Posted on 11/12/2004 9:10:26 PM PST by Retain Mike

This accurate account of the “D-Day Disaster” should help you understand the media stories of Fallujah as they are being invented.

“The allies finally began the second front promised to the Soviets in 1942, as forces landed on the Normandy beaches. The British failed to capture the critical objective of Caen and the U.S. 1st Infantry was been decimated on Omaha beach. The allies suffered many unnecessary casualties because bombers struck innocent civilians behind the beaches instead of Nazi fortifications. Because of an intelligence failure, U.S. Rangers were needlessly slaughtered at Pointe-du-Hoc, when they discovered the artillery they were sent to destroy was never installed. Paratroop drops the night before scattered soldiers so badly few found their objectives by morning and over half are still missing. Back in England un-named sources say General Eisenhower abandoned SHAEF headquarters early in the evening of the 5th. On D-Day they say he appeared at 21 Army Group headquarters to ask a few questions, but took no active part in decisions as landings proceeded. Retired Major General Noel Hopkins a veteran the Somme said attempting this landing when the weather is so unpredictable invites a major counter-offensive precisely when allied air power is grounded. A spokesman for SHAEF says the landings have been successful and the buildup is proceeding on schedule”.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: fallujah; mediacoverage

1 posted on 11/12/2004 9:10:27 PM PST by Retain Mike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Retain Mike

Well said.


2 posted on 11/12/2004 9:16:54 PM PST by aposiopetic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Retain Mike

Ummm, 1942? More like 1944...


3 posted on 11/12/2004 9:19:10 PM PST by rotstan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rotstan
I think they mean that the promise was made in 1942 (to invade)... I think.
4 posted on 11/12/2004 9:25:04 PM PST by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing

Yes.

Churchill wanted to hit the "soft underbelly of Europe" first thought.


5 posted on 11/12/2004 9:29:05 PM PST by swilhelm73 (I voted for Bush. You're welcome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: aposiopetic

It well illustrates the point: any, or all of WWII could be revised in this way...good thing the press was on our side then.


6 posted on 11/12/2004 9:47:06 PM PST by Hayley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Retain Mike

Eisenhower was a "yes" man. He chose a day with the worst possible weather then complained about so much being lost in the seas and because of the seas as if someone else had chosen that day.


7 posted on 11/12/2004 10:11:57 PM PST by El Gran Salseron (My wife just won the "Inmate of the Month" Award! :-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson