Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WSJ: What? Spending Restraint? -- The lame-duck Congress may not be a lame as we thought.
Wall Street Journal ^ | November 19, 2004 | Editorial

Posted on 11/19/2004 6:07:51 AM PST by OESY

...The end of the last fiscal year on September 30 brought good news on the deficit front. And there's a fighting chance that the current lame-duck Congress will actually exercise some restraint in its appropriations for 2005.

The media Furies and partisans are all astir because Congress voted to raise the debt limit again this week, as if not lifting the borrowing cap and defaulting was a viable option for the U.S. But the real story emerging this week is that the White House finally seems serious about holding the line on its budgetary spending strictures -- and won't stand for any fuzzy math either....

In equally good budget news, federal revenues are also bouncing back as economic growth continues. Over the long term, federal revenues have averaged roughly 17% to 19% of GDP. They soared to 21% during the late Clinton years, which is one reason the Bush tax cuts were so important. Amid recession and the burst stock-bubble, however, revenues dipped below 16% in recent years. Now they're heading back toward their normal range.

Fiscal 2004 ended with a federal deficit of $413 billion, well under the Office of Management and Budget's February projection of $521 billion. In October, the 12-month deficit came in under $400 billion, and in the (admittedly brief) three months ending in October the 12-month trend was heading toward $310 billion....

As for the national debt, that's also not a cause for alarm. As the nearby chart shows, overall federal debt as a share of GDP is estimated to be below 40% in 2005, still well below the recent peak of 49.4% in 1993. That is easily manageable by historic standards, and in fact should begin to decline again if the economy keeps growing and annual deficits begin to shrink....

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: appropriations; budget; bush; cbo; clinton; congress; deficit; economicgrowth; economy; federalspending; gdp; holtzeakin; joshbolton; medicare; nationaldebt; omb; recession; revenues; senate; socialsecurity; spending; stockbubble; taxes; tedstevens; veto

1 posted on 11/19/2004 6:07:55 AM PST by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OESY
But the real story emerging this week is that the White House finally seems serious about holding the line on its budgetary spending strictures -- and won't stand for any fuzzy math either....

Words. I want action.

2 posted on 11/19/2004 6:09:39 AM PST by Drango (Those who advocate robbing (taxing) Peter to pay Paul...will always have the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

With spending cuts and economic growth, the debt should be halved to $100 billion in four years. And the Chicken Littles scream the sky is falling!


3 posted on 11/19/2004 6:11:05 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango

how about rescinding the prescription drug plan that is so awful as a starter?


4 posted on 11/19/2004 6:12:53 AM PST by wewon (I puked when I heard W speak about Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OESY
"Federal debt held by the public". See the spike during WW II?

We don't pay for wars with "War Bonds" any more. See my tagline.

5 posted on 11/19/2004 6:17:28 AM PST by snopercod (Inflation, it's how wars are paid for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY
After two wars the Clinton Recession and 9/11 it is a miracle that the deficit is not significantly larger then it is. That said Congress must hold the line on spending, after all what is the economic point of having a Republican House, Senate, and WH if they are going to spend like liberal Democrats, ie the FDR era when the debt to GDP ratio was above 100%
6 posted on 11/19/2004 6:19:11 AM PST by oberon01610
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wewon
And the Farm Act and the No Child Left Behind and etc...

I blame Hassertt and the "Cardinals"...Accusing them of spending like drunken sailors is an insult to the Navy.

7 posted on 11/19/2004 6:20:05 AM PST by Drango (Those who advocate robbing (taxing) Peter to pay Paul...will always have the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OESY

20% budget cuts across all programs except Department of Defense and homeland security would be nice.

In the bloated department of Education this would still give a 20% increase from when Bush first took office... (discraceful)


8 posted on 11/19/2004 10:11:15 AM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/summary.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson