Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RockAgainsttheLeft04
Same as us, lean on him; covertly threaten Jong-Ill with the possibility of a joint American-Chinese military reaction to any N. Korean nuclear aggression.

Why do we need China for this if it is a "military reaction"?

Why do we need a "joint" reaction of any kind?

Why would a joint reaction have to be with China?

123 posted on 11/21/2004 10:18:11 PM PST by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]


To: tallhappy

Because the U.S. + China is a nuclear deterrant like the world has never seen. No argument can be made to stop Korea's nuclear weapon programs that is more effective that the fact that the U.S. and China run #1 & 2 in worldwide nuclear might, and we are not to be toyed with by a tin-pot loony like Kim Jong-Ill.

The presence of China, another communist nation and dictatorship (but one with a vested interest in containing the rogue nation to it's southern border) at the negotiating table also gives the situation a kind of good-cop/bad-cop attitude that we may need if we are to convince Jong-Ill that giving up the nukes is his only option.

"Trust but Verify".


124 posted on 11/21/2004 10:59:32 PM PST by RockAgainsttheLeft04 ("America...F**K YEAH !" -Team America: World Police)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson