Posted on 11/21/2004 3:03:07 AM PST by Lindykim
Heritage Areas implement federal zoning, plain and simple. Proponents of these disasters can spin it any which way they want. The truth is that federal money for Heritage Areas is administered through the National Park Service to radical preservation and conservation groups that are hell-bent to lock away anything and everything within the Heritage Area that they see fit.
In fact, in the actual Heritage Area bills, local greens ARE DIRECTED to lock away and preserve everything in sight. Only this time, with National Heritage Areas, the Park Service formally teams up with local greens to take away YOUR private property rights.
Here's an example from S 1521, just one of the many Heritage Area nightmares. Similar language can be found in EVERY ONE of the other bills:
Section 106b(1) of S 1521 states that the "Management Plan" (which is to be drawn up by greens and the Park Service) must include: "An inventory of the resources contained in the core area of the Heritage Area and any other property in the Heritage Area that is related to the themes of the Heritage Area and that should be preserved, restored, managed, or maintained because of its significance."
Will your property be deemed "significant" to the Heritage Area? How about your street or your block? Once an area becomes a Heritage Area, local control over zoning and land use can be dramatically impacted. To read more on the dangers of Heritage Areas, go to: http://www.americanpolicy.org/prop/natllandgrab.htm .
Local citizens are often SHUT OUT of the process. Property rights can be completely SHUT OUT of the process.
Green edicts will rule the day — and those edicts will have the muscle and backing of the National Park Service.
(Excerpt) Read more at landrights.org ...
Will not withstand a court challange. I hope.
You are right; we can't afford this. We are doubling the population every 40 years through immigration. If we preserve historical and cultural sites, we'll have no place to put the Mexicans ....
ALRA is not credible because they exagerate.
GET US OUT OF UN
GET UN OUT OF US
Based on the constitution, does it allow the government to own any parcel of land?
I have noticed that areas posted off-limits to folks who dont belong to these groups are allowed to be used by members of these groups.
For Instance no one is allowed to chase whales with a boat , but its ok for Greenpeace to do it because they are getting pictures of the whales in their habitat. Yeah!!
This was brought to my attention several years ago. The New American has done a lot of research into it, probably published articles up to ten years ago or so warning of the land grab. Also a book "The Greening of America" dealt with the issue. From what I remember, great corriders running north and south were to be grabbed and put off limits to air traffic and other human traffic to supposedly aid migration patterns for geese and other birds. Effectively, it would limit our ability to move about the country. About the same time, Hillary unveiled her health care program and it was discovered that your health insurance would not cover visits to providers or emergency rooms in any other area than that to which you were assigned (where you live). It's all part of the same plan, to regionalize America, and eventually the world, conceived of by the UN. Another part included forgiving third world debt in exchange for control of their land (a UN plan).
"...we'll have no place to put the Mexicans ...."
May I suggest MEXICO?
'....Prior to 1913, most Americans owned clear, allodial title to property, free and clear of any liens or mortgages until the Federal Reserve Act (1913) "Hypothecated" all property within the federal United States to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, -in which the Trustees (stockholders) held legal title. The U.S. citizen (tenant, franchisee) was registered as a "beneficiary" of the trust via his/her birth certificate. In 1933, the federal United States hypothecated all of the present and future properties, assets and labor of their "subjects," the 14th Amendment U.S. citizen, [see below] to the Federal Reserve System.
In return, the Federal Reserve System agreed to extend the federal United States corporation all the redit "money substitute" it needed. Like any other debtor, the federal United States government had to assign collateral and security to their creditors as a condition of the loan. Since the federal United States didn't have any assets, they assigned the private property of their "economic slaves", the U.S. citizens as collateral against the un-payable federal debt. They also pledged the unincorporated federal territories, national parks forests, birth certificates, and nonprofit organizations, as collateral against the federal debt. All has already been transferred as payment to the international bankers.....' THE BANKRUPTCY OF THE UNITED STATES http://usa-the-republic.com/amendment_14/Index.html
The banksters [via their 'UN'] are calling in their chips.
INDEX TO THE 14TH AMENDMENT
some sample articles:
U.S.A. The Republic, Is The House That Nobody Lives In A detailed study as to how Congress used the 14th Amendment to replace our Republican form of government with a Democracy. This Treatise also details how the 14th Amendment was used to make everyone "property" of the United States that Congress can regulate under U.S. Const., IV:3:2. This is a "must read" Treatise.
How Our Country Was Stolen
Most Americans would agree that we, as a people, are treated by our public servants -- the judges, politicians, law enforcement and bureaucrats who are paid their salaries by our taxes -- as if we were in complete bondage to them. When we joke about being slaves to the Government, we don't realize that we are exactly correct, joke or not. Read on to see how our country was stolen!
The 14th Amendment - Law or Contract How did we move from the "Common Law" where we are innocent until proven guilty and into the "Roman Civil Law" where we must prove our innocence before government agencies? This Treatise shows us how the 14th Amendment was used (as a Contract) to move the people out from under the Common Law and into the Roman Civil Law.....
See also THE REVEALING STORY OF THE RANCHER AND THE NATIONAL DEBT.
http://www.ashevilletribune.com/hage1.htm
Right on comrade troll.
This is part of the UN's Agenda 21. Henry Lamb archives at WND give the best description of this effort to take away our sovernty.
A Big BUMP to you, Sir!!!
Does it not violate our Constitution by having an unelected person representing us in a World Governing body? An appointed person is not my representative.
I want to be able to elect this person and I will only vote for one that runs on a platform of getting us out of the UN.
Thank you! I knew someone on FR would remember this and have information on it. This website is the best.
>>>>"farmers land...burned out and ruined">>>
Where do get the idea that farmers do this? Don't you think farmers were clearing land and making it useful to farm? Its hard to farm on land covered with trees and brush, its impossible actually.
[Local citizens are often SHUT OUT of the process. Property rights can be completely SHUT OUT of the process.]
Sounds like communism to me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.