[Destro]

Sadly, I am getting to trust the Washington Times less and less. They tend lately to represent speculation, hearsay and rumor as headline grabbing facts.

[Mad Mammoth]

Sadly, I am getting to trust the Washington Times less and less

Why? The source of the news story is not hidden, and it is accurately reported that IRAN is claiming that the Saudis have nukes.

Read between the lines, the Times isn't providing free ink to those thugs in Tehran, they are reporting a story which demonstrates the lengths to which the mad mullahs will go to try and divert attention away from their nuclear goals.

Make no mistake about this: IF Tehran acquires even one nuke, they will use it on Israel. You can take that to the bank.

Which is why Israel will pull an Osirak on Iran LONG before Tehran gets to the point where they can target Israel with such a weapon.

The U.S. ought to be doing everything possible to destablize the mullahs and their oppressive regime, and encouraging the Iranian people to overthrow their masters. It was because of the U.S. that the Assahollah Khomeini seized power in the first place after that incompetent, treasonous fool Jimmy Carter betrayed the Shah of Iran, who up until his ouster, was THE most solid ally we had in the region, outside of Israel itself.

We have an obligation to make things right for the Iranian people.

[Coop]

Sadly, I am getting to trust the Washington Times less and less.

Not me.

The story makes it very clear where the info comes from, and I do consider it newsworthy.

[Ethyl]

Sadly, I am getting to trust the Washington Times less and less. They tend lately to represent speculation, hearsay and rumor as headline grabbing facts.

No, you got your papers mixed up, that would be the Washington Post or New York Times.