Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gidget7

Not certain what the heck you mean.

1) There's currently, and always has been, a lot of group sex going on in the US.

2) It isn't currently illegal so there would be no campaign necessary to make it legal or anything.


9 posted on 12/08/2004 10:22:24 AM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Strategerist

It's more evidence that the fight for same sex marriage is the starting point. This "church" stands behind it, and multiple partner marriage.


27 posted on 12/08/2004 10:49:46 AM PST by gidget7 (God Bless America, and our President George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Strategerist
If marriage is defined any way a minister (of the church or of state) wants to define it, can polygamy be far behind?

David Chambers of the University of Michigan Law School, in an article favoring same-sex marriage, has written:

[W]e should respect the.claims made against the hegemony of the two-person unit.If the law of marriage can be seen as facilitating the opportunities of two people to live an emotional life that they find satisfying - rather than as imposing a view of proper relationships - the law ought to be able to achieve the same for units of more than two..By ceasing to conceive of marriage as a partnership composed of one person of each sex, the state may become more receptive to units of three or more and to units composed of two people of the same sex but who are bound by friendship alone.

34 posted on 12/08/2004 10:55:59 AM PST by syriacus (Who wanted Margaret Hassan murdered? What did she know about the oil-for-food scandal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson