Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Bioethics Council Member Proposes Creation of Embryo-Like "Biological Artifacts" for Stem Cells
LifeSite ^ | December 8, 2004

Posted on 12/09/2004 6:06:35 AM PST by NYer

WASHINGTON, December 8, 2004 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The question, "when is an embryo a human being?" continues to dog a bioethics community in search of a way to allow embryonic stem cell research without guilt.

Now, a member of the President's Council on Bioethics, seeking to free up federal funding for embryonic stem cell research, has proposed a new compromise. Dr. William Hurlbut has proposed the creation of a new kind of genetically engineered "organismic entity" that would produce human embryonic stem cells, but which would not qualify, he says, as a human embryo.

Hurlbut, a member of the President's Council on Bioethics since 2002, and professor of biology at Stanford University, told the Council on Friday, "This altered nuclear transfer may be able to generate functional embryonic stem cells from a system that is not an embryo but possess the limited organic potential of a tissue or cell culture."

Scientific research into genetic manipulation of human cells, ova, sperm and human beings at the embryonic stage has resulted in the creation of things for which no human language has any words. Human/animal hybrids, for example were called "chimera," a Greek word that the Oxford English dictionary translates as, "wild, impossible scheme or unreal conception."

Hurlbut said, "What we propose is the creation of entities that never rise to the level of integrated organismal existence essential to be designated human life with potential." By a technique he calls, "Alternate Nuclear Transfer," (ANT) he proposes to create an "entity" that "would have no inherent principal of unity, no coherent drive in the direction of the mature human form and no claim on the moral status due to a developing human life." Hurlbut calls this entity a "biological artifact," since, he says, it is a "human creation for human ends."

Dr. Richard Dorflinger, spokesman for the US Conference of Catholic Bishops, said he was not convinced that the newest thing for which there is no name is not simply a severely disabled human being in the embryonic stage.

Pro-lifers have been dismissed as alarmists when they have tried to warn legislators that cloning by other names and in other guises was coming and would not be prohibited under new laws which define cloning very narrowly and claim to ban all cloning. Dr. Dorflinger echoed these warnings, saying of Dr. Hurlbut's proposal, "Such a procedure would not be prohibited by the cloning bans the Catholic bishops have supported at the state or federal level."

However, Dorflinger seemed to put his concern aside when he gave a cautious green light to proceeding with the research. "I certainly appreciate the conceptual model that Dr. Hurlbut has presented and I think exploration in animal models is well worth at least pursuing at this time," he said.

Read Dr. Hurlbut's presentation (beginning at the bottom of page 61.):
http://www.bioethics.gov/transcripts/dec04/dec03.d...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: California; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: ant; bioethics; embryo; richarddorflinger

1 posted on 12/09/2004 6:06:35 AM PST by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: american colleen; sinkspur; Lady In Blue; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; ...
Catholic Ping - please freepmail me if you want on/off this list


2 posted on 12/09/2004 6:07:06 AM PST by NYer ("Blessed be He who by His love has given life to all." - final prayer of St. Charbel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cpforlife.org; Mr. Silverback; Coleus

Ping!


3 posted on 12/09/2004 6:07:51 AM PST by NYer ("Blessed be He who by His love has given life to all." - final prayer of St. Charbel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Hurlbut calls this entity a "biological artifact," since, he says, it is a "human creation for human ends."

Science now equates itself with God, the Creator of the Universe.

4 posted on 12/09/2004 6:10:42 AM PST by NYer ("Blessed be He who by His love has given life to all." - final prayer of St. Charbel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
"biological artifact,"

How Orwellian!

5 posted on 12/09/2004 7:33:09 AM PST by SuziQ (W STILL the President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer; 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; annalex; ...

Adult stem cells work.


6 posted on 12/11/2004 6:49:16 PM PST by Coleus (I support ethical, effective and safe stem cell research and use: adult, umbilical cord, bone marrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Drs. Frankenstein, Moreau, and Mengele approve ...


7 posted on 12/11/2004 6:51:21 PM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
Adult stem cells work.

Absolutely, positively, utterly, and in all other ways WRONG!!!!

The purpose of "embryonic stem cell research" is not to cure illnesses in adult people.

The purpose of "embryonic stem cell research" is to justify abortion on demand.

For that purpose, adult stem cell research is worse than useless: it is counterproductive.

Because, as you rightly point out, it is effective at treating illnesses in adult people.

8 posted on 12/11/2004 6:54:59 PM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

Explain Alternate Nuclear Transfer, please.


9 posted on 12/11/2004 7:02:28 PM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Alternate nuclear transfer is the removal of the nucleus from an ovum (or other cell) and placing the nucleus of another cell into said ovum (or other cell), followed by inducing that cell to grow and reproduce. Theoretically, if the host cell is in fact an ovum, the result of growth etc. will be development into a baby, etc. It's a method of cloning.

In this particular instance, Dr. FrankHurlbut wants to use "Cumulus Cells", which are not ova but develop in the ovaries surrounding the actual ova, as the host cells. He seems to think that they will not be capable of growing into an embryo -> fetus -> baby -> etc. but that they will produce "useful" embryonic stem cells.

I think he's playing semantic games.

10 posted on 12/11/2004 7:31:56 PM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
It is the cumulus (or 'tender cells) that is different in this from Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer used to clone Dolly the sheep. It is amazing that, absent a clear understanding of human being at embryo age, scientists are more than willing to play god and try to produce human tissues from 'non-human beings'. I wonder: how will the scientists (little gods) prove that the cumulus cell, once denucleated then renucleated and stimulated, not grow into a baby to be born? Truly, the spirit of Mengele lives on in these 'modern' scientists.
11 posted on 12/11/2004 10:11:29 PM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson