Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Manitoba drivers to stand on one leg, count out loud in roadside drug tests
canada.com ^ | 12 12 04 | Steve Lambert

Posted on 12/13/2004 3:27:24 PM PST by freepatriot32

WINNIPEG (CP) -- Manitoba drivers suspected of being high on drugs will be asked to perform a specific series of tasks, including standing on one leg while counting out loud, under new regulations approved by the NDP government.

"The tests are, by nature, divided attention tests," David Greening, a senior Justice Department policy analyst, said in an interview.

"(Police) can determine if a person is impaired by how they perform on the tests."

The new regulations stem from amendments to the provincial Highway Traffic Act approved by the legislature last spring which are intended to crack down on motorists who drive under the influence of drugs.

While police can use breathalysers to test for alcohol impairment, they do not have machines to test for drug impairment. So the province has had to develop a standardized motor skills test for suspected drug users.

The new regulations spell out three specific tasks that officers must make motorists perform.

The drivers will first be told to look at an object in the officer's hand and follow it as the officer moves it.

Drivers will then be required to walk in a straight line while counting the number of steps out loud, turning around, and taking the same number of steps in return.

Finally, the drivers will have to raise one foot and count out loud while keeping their eyes on the raised foot.

Having a standard test across the province should ensure that drivers are treated fairly, said Greening.

"The advantage of the standardized test is that it's scientifically approved and has been approved by agencies such as the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in the United States and the International Association of Chiefs of Police," he said.

Those who fail the test can have their vehicles impounded and drivers' licence suspended for 24 hours or more.

Quebec and British Columbia have similar laws.

The issue flared up for provincial governments after the federal government signalled it is preparing to decriminalize the possession of small amounts of marijuana. The provinces have said the change could lead to an increase in drugged drivers.

Police officers across the province are being trained to administer the new roadside test, said Greening.

"I think at this point, roughly over 50 officers have been trained."


TOPICS: Canada; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: baaa; canada; count; drivers; drug; govwatch; in; lbertarians; leg; loud; manitoba; on; one; out; privacy; roadside; sheeple; stand; tests; to; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: hellinahandcart

You beat me!!!!! I was two busy looking for the Damm Pic, LOL!


21 posted on 12/13/2004 3:55:05 PM PST by cmsgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

lol


22 posted on 12/13/2004 3:55:43 PM PST by ApesForEvolution (You will NEVER convince me that Muhammadanism isn't a death cult that must end. Save your time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FierceDraka

My father was pulled over one time and administered a roadside impairment test. The test began with the officer asking him to say the alphabet backwards beginning from W, without pausing, start now. No joke. I am stone cold sober and could not do this if you paid me.


23 posted on 12/13/2004 3:56:28 PM PST by closet freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

I had A Fl hwy Patrol take away my cruches (one leg in cast from hip to toes from drunk driver) and expected me to preform same tests. Local cop came by and reconized me, otherwise I was going in. 5 years sober at that point, swerved when my infant son vomited on me from car seat. State cop said I was "falling down drunk"


24 posted on 12/13/2004 3:57:55 PM PST by Lotec (Those who regulate what you consume will regulate what you read, think & say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: closet freeper

Oh the job of dreams. Being an asshole cop.


25 posted on 12/13/2004 4:06:20 PM PST by Clypp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
"Manitoba drivers suspected of being high on drugs will be asked to perform a specific series of tasks, including standing on one leg while counting out loud..."

It always amazes me how many people are stupid enough to accommodate the "performing monkey" request.

Even if it weren't so demeaning, why would you volunteer to possibly incriminate yourself? You may be required to submit to a blood, urine, or breath test (if probable cause exists), but field sobriety tests (aka, performing monkey tests) are 100% optional.

Just tell the officer, hell no!

--Boot Hill

26 posted on 12/13/2004 4:14:40 PM PST by Boot Hill (Candy-gram for Osama bin Mongo, candy-gram for Osama bin Mongo!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
The new regulations spell out three specific tasks that officers must make motorists perform.

The drivers will first be told to look at an object in the officer's hand and follow it as the officer moves it.

Drivers will then be required to walk in a straight line while counting the number of steps out loud, turning around, and taking the same number of steps in return.

Finally, the drivers will have to raise one foot and count out loud while keeping their eyes on the raised foot

No speak English. Get me interpreter. No understand Mr. Policeman. Show me.

Anyone who follows these commands should be charged with having too much dopamine in their system.

27 posted on 12/13/2004 4:15:45 PM PST by LoneRangerMassachusetts (Some say what's good for others, the others make the goods; it's the meddlers against the peddlers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cmsgop

I thought coming back on one hand was the funniest part.


28 posted on 12/13/2004 4:16:48 PM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

I would put my hands on my hips and do a Riverdance tap dance while reciting the alphabet starting with Z. That would totally trump the stupid test and entertain the drivers at the same time.


29 posted on 12/13/2004 4:26:21 PM PST by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart
Thats one of my favorite movies ever,I'm getting it on DVD. My wife thinks I'm nuts...
30 posted on 12/13/2004 4:48:08 PM PST by cmsgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart

LOL! Me too...


31 posted on 12/13/2004 4:51:14 PM PST by ApesForEvolution (You will NEVER convince me that Muhammadanism isn't a death cult that must end. Save your time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

Way easier than the Brothers Against Drunk Driving sobriety test: say the alphabet backwards, skipping all the vowels, and give the sign language version for each letter as you go past.


32 posted on 12/13/2004 5:34:30 PM PST by KarlInOhio (In a just world, Arafat would have died at the end of a rope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

Manitoba, Mississippi. Stand on one leg,stand on an egg balanced upon a wedge of iceburg lettuce. Nothing makes any difference. If alcohol is not evil in your world view you will lose. So far you can stay home as long as the lights are out .


33 posted on 12/13/2004 5:45:25 PM PST by nkycincinnatikid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
Oh really? Tell that to my best friend's brother-in-law who is now a quadriplegic. If you choose to drink and drive, you also have chosen to break the law... and if you get caught, good!
34 posted on 12/13/2004 7:46:07 PM PST by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

The Canadian program is actually less intrusive then the coming U.S. law.


35 posted on 12/15/2004 4:03:10 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson