Note to Mods: the title had to be shortened in order to post.
The psycho spews forth his venom, as usual. This guy really needs to get a grip.
Sign me up!!! /sarcasm
Hey Satan rides a softail, so does my husband. People say he looks like Satan. Go figure.
On the one hand, he's infuriating. On the other, he's good for a laugh. And he just makes the left's problems so obvious and clear.
Do I hafta?
Day by day, hour by hour, minute by minute, he becomes more unhinged from reality.
Ms Morford needs her thorazine suppostories stat!
I could go for free candy. Especially chocolate
I haven't heard much whining coming out of our side lately. What a loser. I whine to no one.
Whether they legalize gay marriage in Canada or not is of little concern. Last I checked, we didn't gauge our laws by what courts in Canada do.
What is far more interesting is that fact that the only state in the Union that has legalized gay marriage thus far may be overturning that ruling by removing the four judges that created gay marriage.
http://www.massnews.com/2004_editions/12_dec/121404_all_legistlators_notified_that_Dimasi_Agrees_to_Vote.htm
When they are removed, their ruling goes down with them.
He concludes the article with "What's wrong with us?"
The real question is what's wrong with him. If he thinks that Canada is so great, nothing's stopping him from going there unless he has a felony arrest. It would be a win-win; he gets to live in the society of his fantasies and we get rid of him.
Why in God's name won't he MOVE THERE IF IT'S UTOPIA?!?!?!
Jeez these canadian loving americans all one thing in common. They never ever go there!
(e) The highest courts in three states have held that denying the legal rights and obligations of marriage to same-sex couples is constitutionally suspect or impermissible under their respective state constitutions. These states are Hawaii, Vermont, and Massachusetts. The highest courts in seven Canadian provinces have similarly ruled that marriage laws that discriminate in favor of different-sex couples to the exclusion of same-sex couples violate the rights of same-sex couples and cannot stand.
(f) California's discriminatory exclusion of same-sex couples from marriage violates the California Constitution's guarantee of due process, privacy, equal protection of the law, and free expression, by arbitrarily denying equal marriage rights to lesbian, gay, and bisexual Californians.
(g) California's discriminatory exclusion of same-sex couples from marriage harms same-sex couples and their families by denying those couples and their families specific legal rights and responsibilities under state law and by depriving members of those couples and their families of a legal basis to challenge federal laws that deny access to the many important federal benefits and obligations provided only to spouses. Those federal benefits include the right to file joint federal income tax returns, the right to sponsor a partner for immigration to the United States, the right to social security survivor's benefits, the right to family and medical leave, and many other substantial benefits and obligations.
(h) Other jurisdictions have chosen to treat as valid or otherwise recognize marriages between same-sex couples. California's discriminatory marriage law therefore also harms California's same-sex couples when they travel to other jurisdictions by preventing them from having access to the rights, benefits, and protections those jurisdictions provide only to married couples.
(i) California's discriminatory exclusion of same-sex couples from marriage further harms same-sex couples and their families by denying them the unique public recognition and affirmation that marriage confers on heterosexual couples.
I like to steal porn right out of the hands of children.
I'm evil.