Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Michael.SF.

But why should government even be in the business of building facilities primarily used for private business? I say, let business take care of that.

The Pacific Bell Park arrangement worked out great; why not more of the same in other cities? Give the taxpayer a break for a change!


26 posted on 12/16/2004 2:38:09 PM PST by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: B Knotts
But why should government even be in the business of building facilities primarily used for private business?

To make a city a more desirable place to live, to generate tax revenues, to capitalize on advertising dollars, to help secure employment for city residents, to help draw visitors to the city, to have facilities which allow them to draw bigger acclaim (the Olympics), to provide a site to smaller groups that could not otherwise play at such a facility (small colleges, High school champioships etc.), to attract businesses (restaurants, hotels) to an otherwise less then desirable neighborhood.

31 posted on 12/16/2004 2:46:03 PM PST by Michael.SF. ("My only regret in life is that none of my children are gay." - Sharon Osborne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson