So, it's ok for gays to boycott businesses if said businesses don't kiss their butts, but people opposed to a radical gay agenda aren't allowed to use their dollars to influence business?
I consider both to be knee-jerk reactions, and equally invalid.
Target doesn't support GLBKJGKLJDFKLDF(insert letters here) causes anymore than it supports Christian ones.
For years, Target had a good relationiship with the SA, an extremely decent charitable organization (among other things), but the SA's bell-ringer presence on Target property was a quiet exception to the policy. Once the policy, and especially SA's exception started getting more and more heat, it became apparent to Target that they had three choices, all of them losers: