[orionblamblam]

You're knocking a quote from the article?

You continue to behave oddly.

[jwalsh07]

You continue to behave oddly.

You continue to simply disregard the facts. I gave you a quote from the article. Flews position is that his take on the science leads him to "believe" in a deistic God.

I don't really know why you're arguing that point, it is Flew's opinion. That you have a different one has no bearing on the matter.

[jwalsh07]

FLEW: I think that the most impressive arguments for God’s existence are those that are supported by recent scientific discoveries. I’ve never been much impressed by the kalam cosmological argument, and I don’t think it has gotten any stronger recently. However, I think the argument to Intelligent Design is enormously stronger than it was when I first met it.

This direct quote from Antony Flew should clear things up.