Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pharmboy
...the English thought of them as dirty savages and treated them terribly."

How else would you regard treacherous stone age aborigines who engaged in terroristic murder, torture and cannibalism and who were in fact physically dirty?


18 posted on 01/01/2005 7:55:11 AM PST by nathanbedford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nathanbedford
Interesting that the French embraced them, learned their languages and lived amongst them.

While speaking of our aborigines, allow me to remind all of our Freepers that during the RevWar the only Algonquin tribe to stand with the patriots were the Oneidas. Please always support them.

37 posted on 01/01/2005 8:42:28 AM PST by Pharmboy (Listen...you can still hear the old media sobbing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford
How else would you regard treacherous stone age aborigines who engaged in terroristic murder, torture and cannibalism and who were in fact physically dirty?

You've chosen your screen name well.

38 posted on 01/01/2005 8:43:18 AM PST by wtc911 ("I would like at least to know his name.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford

I would call them freedom fighters. The year 1492 was the Native american's 9/11. Before you go calling Indians names, just remember your ancestors were the same way. They were barbarians who just had an edge in organized violence. As a matter of fact, every people group had cannibals too. Just reference the Donner part and Jefferey Dahmer. Have a nice day.


140 posted on 03/29/2005 12:29:58 PM PST by Redcitizen (One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson