To: Pharmboy
...the English thought of them as dirty savages and treated them terribly." How else would you regard treacherous stone age aborigines who engaged in terroristic murder, torture and cannibalism and who were in fact physically dirty?
To: nathanbedford
Interesting that the French embraced them, learned their languages and lived amongst them.
While speaking of our aborigines, allow me to remind all of our Freepers that during the RevWar the only Algonquin tribe to stand with the patriots were the Oneidas. Please always support them.
37 posted on
01/01/2005 8:42:28 AM PST by
Pharmboy
(Listen...you can still hear the old media sobbing.)
To: nathanbedford
How else would you regard treacherous stone age aborigines who engaged in terroristic murder, torture and cannibalism and who were in fact physically dirty?
You've chosen your screen name well.
38 posted on
01/01/2005 8:43:18 AM PST by
wtc911
("I would like at least to know his name.")
To: nathanbedford
I would call them freedom fighters. The year 1492 was the Native american's 9/11. Before you go calling Indians names, just remember your ancestors were the same way. They were barbarians who just had an edge in organized violence. As a matter of fact, every people group had cannibals too. Just reference the Donner part and Jefferey Dahmer. Have a nice day.
140 posted on
03/29/2005 12:29:58 PM PST by
Redcitizen
(One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson