[spitlana]

First, he recognized that evolutionary theory has no reasonable explanation for “the first emergence of living from non-living matter”—that is, the origin of life. Second, even if a living cell or primitive animal had somehow assembled itself from non-living chemicals, he reasoned it would have no ability to reproduce.

Why is this rocket science to grasp?? Didn't we "know" this to be true when we were children....before we got doused with major brainwashing by evolutionist teaching? A perfectly intelligent man finally gets it after 81 years.

[Dimensio]

Why is this rocket science to grasp??

Well, a lot of people never study evolution and as such they never learn that the theory of evolution does not, in any way, address the emergence of living cells from non-living matter, and it never has. Many creationists attempt to attack evolution based upon this premise, not realising that they don't understand evolution at all.