[NJ_gent]

"I'm sure there are those who would say this ruling sucks."

Yes, that'd be the 'conservatives of convenience' who are only conservative insofar as it allows them to push their agenda. They're all for limited government when that government threatens to prevent them from pushing that agenda. The moment Big Government can do something for them, like step in and regulate the sex life of strangers, they implode to expose their true (liberal) nature.

Government is not the solution to our problems...

[weegee]

I stand opposed to judicial tyranny. Let the legislature overturn the law, not the courts. It is only being done away with now to set the stage for further legislating from the bench.

[TOUGH STOUGH]

"The moment Big Government can do something for them, like step in and regulate the sex life of strangers, they implode to expose their true (liberal) nature."

Did you READ the article? This law has been in effect since the early 1800's. There are NO conservatives crying for NEW legislation, or the enforcement of this old legislation as your post suggests.

As a symbol of the morality this nation has strived to achieve throughout most of it's history, I am sorry it was struck down.

Now don't dare try to make the LIBERAL argument I am interested in PEEPING in people's bedrooms, I'm not. I am sick of our tax dollars paying for children out of wedlock, abortion, birthcontorl and the like.