Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MCI Mulls Qwest Bid, Talks with Verizon
Reuters (Yahoo!) ^ | 2/3/05 | Reuters

Posted on 02/03/2005 7:00:02 AM PST by retrokitten

PHILADELPHIA (Reuters) - Telephone company MCI Inc. (Nasdaq:MCIP - news) has received a $6 billion takeover bid from Qwest Communications International Inc. (NYSE:Q - news) and has held talks with another potential suitor, Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE:VZ - news), sources familiar with the situation said on Thursday.

Although MCI has been looking for a buyer for months, interest in the company intensified after long-distance rival AT&T Corp. (NYSE:T - news) last week agreed to be acquired by SBC Communications Inc. (NYSE:SBC - news) for $16 billion, the sources said.

Long-distance companies have been slammed by eroding long-distance revenue, price wars and increased competition, but they serve high-spending corporate customers, a client base that the Baby Bells want to tap.

(Excerpt) Read more at story.news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: mci; qwest; telecom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 02/03/2005 7:00:03 AM PST by retrokitten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: retrokitten

Let's see...MCI merges with Qwest, then Verizon and Qwest merge. That corporation could then merge with SBC and they could call it ....... AT&T! What a novel concept!


2 posted on 02/03/2005 7:02:31 AM PST by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

LOL! It says further down in the article that Verizon has also expressed an interest in MCI, but has not made a formal offer as of yet.


3 posted on 02/03/2005 7:25:56 AM PST by retrokitten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: retrokitten

Bell South is the only sensible RBOC. So far, they have stayed out of merger mania. AT&T is a shadow of its former self. I retired from AT&T in 1999 after 38 years of service and I saw the company when it was in its hey day. After divestiture, AT&T tried to redifine itself and its management made some terrible decisions. (NCR's hostile takeover was one, getting into local service was another. Now, it seems that parts of "MA BELL" are coming back together. Through it all, the customers and the shareholders of AT&T have suffered the most.


4 posted on 02/03/2005 8:52:37 AM PST by teletech (Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

Qwest had best get rid of the MCI management then (full disclosure - I am a former MCI customer, and they could not do anything right. M stands for Maggot, C stands for Cluster----, I stands for Idiot. WorldCom is short for World of Incompetence. End of rant).

As for teletech's comment about AT&T, I think AT&T could have survived the court ordered divestiture, if it were not for Robert Allen (a.k.a. Mister Rogers, an inside term for the worst CEO in AT&T history). The NCR was just one blunder. A bigger problem with AT&T was it's kowtowing to political pressure groups within the company. Maintaining on overhead a large staff of "diversity zampolits".


5 posted on 02/03/2005 9:59:23 AM PST by Fred Hayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: teletech

It isn't as though BellSouth hasn't tried! They tried to get Sprint, they tried to get GTE, they even tried to get MCI at one time. Meanwhile, we are now down to three RBHCs plus Sprint.


6 posted on 02/03/2005 10:02:24 AM PST by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Fred Hayek

I thought MCI stood for "Most Cluttered Infrastructure".


7 posted on 02/03/2005 10:04:46 AM PST by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: teletech
BellSouth needs a new CEO. That guy has been there way too long.
8 posted on 02/03/2005 10:06:40 AM PST by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale
It isn't as though BellSouth hasn't tried! They tried to get Sprint, they tried to get GTE, they even tried to get MCI at one time. Meanwhile, we are now down to three RBHCs plus Sprint.

I'm not so sure that owning a long distance company is a good move. Maybe Bell South should stay with its core local service business and expand its wireless business.

9 posted on 02/03/2005 10:39:06 AM PST by teletech (Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sprite518
BellSouth needs a new CEO. That guy has been there way too long.

Why?

10 posted on 02/03/2005 10:39:53 AM PST by teletech (Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale
That corporation could then merge with SBC and they could call it ....... AT&T! What a novel concept!

LOL, except that AT & T has already been bought by Cingular.

11 posted on 02/03/2005 10:42:54 AM PST by Mark17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mark17

That was my point -- eventually, it all ends up where it started.


12 posted on 02/03/2005 11:06:27 AM PST by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale
I see your point.

Regards.

13 posted on 02/03/2005 11:57:56 AM PST by Mark17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: teletech
Because they need some new blood. The guy has broke his promise of leaving the company more than once. Furthermore, he took a bonus after he laid people off. Why should he get a bonus if he can't afford to keep people employed. The guy is a dweab as was lead around by the CFO for years. I do not think BellSouth is in that great of a position.
14 posted on 02/03/2005 12:03:05 PM PST by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: retrokitten

The mergers may be bad, but at least I'd get some decent service in my small town, my local independant telco is absolute crap...


15 posted on 02/03/2005 1:01:18 PM PST by MD_Willington_1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

Many Changes Instantly


16 posted on 02/03/2005 1:11:50 PM PST by wtc911 ("I would like at least to know his name.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: retrokitten

Only problem is, Qwest is hindered by more than $17 billion in debt (they sold off their properties to smaller local phone companies in several western states many years ago), yet by the same token, they lack wireless unit and largely lack competition from cable and high-speed data companies.


17 posted on 02/17/2005 8:36:12 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (Smoke free since January 16, 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark17
LOL, except that AT & T has already been bought by Cingular.

Right, and the Verizon's, MCI's, SBC's, Southern Bell's, and Qwest's of the world were once AT&T.

18 posted on 02/17/2005 8:38:27 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (Smoke free since January 16, 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MD_Willington_1976
The mergers may be bad, but at least I'd get some decent service in my small town, my local independant telco is absolute crap...

The only complaints I have with my local independently owned telco is their internet service which is spotty at best. Also, their cell service is still analog, its sucks, and doesn't reach me, even though the tower is 6 miles distance away as the crow flies. You have to spend a fortune just to get ADSL (if your lucky enough to live close enough to the nearest central office).

They did wise up and realize that their customer base (farmers and ranchers) would end up making long distance phone calls to order equipment parts in town.

Nowadays, I can call someone 100 miles away (in the local telephone coverage area) and it's a local call. Before that, the neighbor that lives a mile west of me was a long distance phone call.

19 posted on 02/17/2005 8:46:27 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (Smoke free since January 16, 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

Ours is junk, plain and simple, all the equipment is really old, dsl sucks...I'm thinking of just getting wireless and telling the local telco to go sit and spin...I'm not remotely happy with them anymore.


20 posted on 02/18/2005 9:09:46 AM PST by MD_Willington_1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson