To: nwrep
Too bad Ward Churchill doesn't get to live under the rule of a Saddam Hussien or Pol Pot or Idi Amin or similar.
9 posted on
02/06/2005 5:15:21 PM PST by
TomGuy
(America: Best friend or worst enemy. Choose wisely.)
To: TomGuy
"Too bad Ward Churchill doesn't get to live under the rule of a Saddam Hussien or Pol Pot or Idi Amin or similar."
On the contrary, Ward would be right at home. He'd be second-in-command...until he bumped off the Boss.
To: TomGuy
Agreed. But you know...all these people on the left think they would be better off with people like that in charge. They think they would be part of a government like that. An insider. What they don't realize is that if they lived with murderers like that, they would be DEAD.
83 posted on
02/06/2005 7:31:49 PM PST by
Cricket24
("We have met the enemy and it's the U.S. press (and the democrats)!")
To: TomGuy
Too bad Ward Churchill doesn't get to live under the rule of a Saddam Hussien or Pol Pot or Idi Amin or similar. It's still not too late to send him to North Korea.
98 posted on
02/06/2005 8:23:01 PM PST by
Paleo Conservative
(Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
To: TomGuy
Without the United States 95 percent of the worlds population would be enslaved and suffering.There is no other country that would liberate and protect entire continents and only take the land that was needed to bury their dead soldiers.If America was the evil rogue that liberals like Churchill make it out to be it would own and control three quarters of the world.Some people have forgotten just how good America has been to them over the years but I'm sure they'll remember as soon as they need to be saved again.Let them go ask the UN to save them next time since they have so much faith in it.
108 posted on
02/06/2005 9:41:06 PM PST by
rdcorso
(When Will The UN Admit It Is Being Run By A Stupid Bastard ???????????)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson