To: ViLaLuz
No one is stifling him. He's free to give his speech, off-campus. I agree, he has the right to speak out, but the university is under no obligation to sponser that right. He's such a big believer in free speech - let him go to the town square and make his speech.
It's one thing to stand under the protective umbrella of academia - but let's see how he slithers when he has to step into the public spotlight.
8 posted on
02/08/2005 3:50:20 PM PST by
Tennessee_Bob
(Come on you sons of bitches! Do you want to live forever?)
To: Tennessee_Bob
10 posted on
02/08/2005 3:56:51 PM PST by
Jay777
(Gen. Tommy Franks for President in 08)
To: Tennessee_Bob
This terrorist loving weasel deserves to be strung up from a light pole for the disgusting insults he hurled at the victims of 9/11.The liberal freaks like this professor are supporting the most vile group of murderers because of their misguided hate of America.They should be sent to a place that is run by the terrorist they support so they can have their heads chopped off like they deserve.It's funny how he calls the people who are threatening to kill him a bunch of crazies but can't seem to label the terrorist as anything but heroes.The sick bastard is gross.
24 posted on
02/08/2005 4:42:40 PM PST by
rdcorso
(When Will The UN Admit It Is Being Run By A Stupid Bastard ???????????)
To: Tennessee_Bob
"The university ... is obligated to provide security for Ward Churchill. They simply can't put a gag in his mouth by telling him, 'Well, there are these violent wackos out there that want kill you so we're not going to let you give your speech.'" So the University has "obligations" and Ward Churchill has "rights". Funny how come it is never the other way around.
29 posted on
02/08/2005 5:12:12 PM PST by
oldbrowser
(You lost the election...........get over it)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson